The CBB

sano wrote:

MrKrov wrote:state aims
get results

Yes, exactly, leave the details to be assumed or better yet, interpreted.

I'm sorry but that seems to be a dishonest clipping of my post to make a cheap shot which so happens to make no sense. G'day.

state aims
get results

Develop a brief typological overview before commencing, a list of things to include to determine harmoniousness.


---

Possibly a syllabus.

That'd be a terrible idea. Odds are good if you actually want to be able to pronounce them, there's a site or thread all about that.

I don't see anything blatantly wonky, but you'll learn my terrible secret that I'm not a history buff.

I don't notice Arabic grammar anywhere. Tip: you didn't need that apostrophe s there. 3 cases, NOM, ACC and GEN, also a DEF article and no INDEF That and the bits of actual morphology given are basically identical, with the case suffixes switching roles around somewhat. I find it a wee bit odd /ʒ/ ...

It's an uninspiring mismash of bits of Arabic and English grammar. Doesn't leave a lot to be said.

What is this special substance? Where does that come from and why is it less environmentally destructive? Why is it not a complete copout?

Your goals for this, uh, script are?


Some of the letters look impractically shaped.

Language (general) http://www.zompist.com/kit.htm lhttp://www.zompist.com/virtuver.htm http://www.eskimo.com/~ram/essays.html http://www.conlanger.com/links.html http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/ranto/index.html http://web.archive.org/web/20030622112432/www.cix.co.uk/~morven/lang/esp.html http://w...