Ah, very likely to be the case! Memories of that elusive Elsewhere...Keenir wrote:(unless the faulty memory is also - unawares to my awareness - a glimpse at another corner of the polyverse)elemtilas wrote:Clearly my good sir, Keenir has come back to us from some far distant corner of the polyverse where the named work is, in fact, a thing.
(C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6354
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Anyone who has ever been married surely believes on the basis of personal experience that, not only are there alternative futures, there are also alternative pasts.elemtilas wrote:Ah, very likely to be the case! Memories of that elusive Elsewhere...Keenir wrote:(unless the faulty memory is also - unawares to my awareness - a glimpse at another corner of the polyverse)
When one person remembers an event one way and their spouse remembers it the other way, clearly the simplest and most Occam's-Razor-compatible explanation is, that they have arrived (all unawares until just now) from alternate histories.
Also; when the numbers on the scale your spouse steps on are higher than they were previously, that is clearly because the Earth's gravitational force has fluctuated.
(It's just too far-fetched to think that they've gained weight.)
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
@Eldin
Spoiler:
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
How true!eldin raigmore wrote:Anyone who has ever been married surely believes on the basis of personal experience that, not only are there alternative futures, there are also alternative pasts.elemtilas wrote:Memories of that elusive Elsewhere...
When one person remembers an event one way and their spouse remembers it the other way, clearly the simplest and most Occam's-Razor-compatible explanation is, that they have arrived (all unawares until just now) from alternate histories.
At the risk of raising the ire of the Defamationists and other assorted tan bechemised Busybodies, anyone who has lived within that Blessed Estate knows that, in truth, Occam's Razor only cuts one way in this circumstance: Hers is the true Reality, usassailable, brooking no argument; thine is the misremembered and illformed phantasy!, surely the application of Her sound Logic & firm Reason will enlighten a poor boy of his folly, if only he would open his eyes and see the Truth of all things!
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
There is just one reality...
man rules the world for the pleasure of woman...
woman rules man for her pleasure...
(Is that sociobiology...)
man rules the world for the pleasure of woman...
woman rules man for her pleasure...
(Is that sociobiology...)
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
difficult to say...
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Maybe there is some connection between river directions and the trade winds. Otherwise, running towards the equator makes alot of sense.
Also I've been looking for a map like that for ages.
Also I've been looking for a map like that for ages.
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
You are kind of assuming here that there forces that can make rivers run against gravity. On flatter land erosion has a say on gradually changing the paths of rivers but they'll still flow where gravity takes them, i.e. downhill. There's a certain logic in saying that the centrifugal force caused by Earth's rotation should give rivers a push towards the equator, but in fact it already pushes the planet's rocky body the same way, making it slightly squashed. This means that the surfaces of constant gravity are also deformed, bulging at the equator, and the downward direction where the apparent gravity points isn't exactly towards the centre of the planet. In the end, it's still just topography that makes rivers flow where they do.Ahzoh wrote:Maybe there is some connection between river directions and the trade winds. Otherwise, running towards the equator makes alot of sense.
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Right. That whole "rivers flow (generally) to the South", towards the equator, was really only valid back during the Shenhua Epochs of Earth's history. Of course, this was well back in geological history, before the Reshaping. The shape of the Earth during those early periods, travelling towards the equator really did mean a (slightly) downward shift in elevation and it certainly made sense for rivers to, by and by, ultimately flow in that direction.gach wrote:You are kind of assuming here that there forces that can make rivers run against gravity. On flatter land erosion has a say on gradually changing the paths of rivers but they'll still flow where gravity takes them, i.e. downhill. There's a certain logic in saying that the centrifugal force caused by Earth's rotation should give rivers a push towards the equator, but in fact it already pushes the planet's rocky body the same way, making it slightly squashed. This means that the surfaces of constant gravity are also deformed, bulging at the equator, and the downward direction where the apparent gravity points isn't exactly towards the centre of the planet. In the end, it's still just topography that makes rivers flow where they do.Ahzoh wrote:Maybe there is some connection between river directions and the trade winds. Otherwise, running towards the equator makes alot of sense.
Can still see some evidences of this tendency in the flow direction of the most ancient of Earth's rivers. Even those that now flow northwards, originally were part of lengthier rivers that flowed eventually equatorwards. The (modern) Meuse, though it now flows northwards, simply emptied into the great Archaeomanica River that eventually flowed into the southern sea. Also of note is the Susquehanna which did and still does flow entirely equatorwards, and also the New which at one time flowed west-southwestwards, then southwards into the Mississippian Embayment and thence to the southern sea towards the equator.
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
In general (once the earth's had a long time to settle down into an equilibrium state), as a physicist (but not a geophysicist), I can't see any reason to favour any particular direction because, in general, on geological timescales, the crust's pretty good at settling into an equipotential surface. The main effect forcing river formation are orogeny (which is itself affected by plate tectonics, which could pick up an orientation from the rotation of the core I guess but I'm not sure what directions it'd prefer). Prevailing winds could be a very tiny effect helping gouge rivers into mountains and they'd encourage east-west (or vice versa, depending on latitude) rivers.
Looking at the map and doing some very orugh and unscientific guesswork of numbers most of the rivers look diagonal to me with only a few exceptions (although those exceptions are big ones: the Danube, Ganges, and Amazon all run approximately west->east and the Nile runs approximately south->north)
Looking at the map and doing some very orugh and unscientific guesswork of numbers most of the rivers look diagonal to me with only a few exceptions (although those exceptions are big ones: the Danube, Ganges, and Amazon all run approximately west->east and the Nile runs approximately south->north)
My pronouns are they/them/their
native | advanced | intermediate | intermediate | basic | lapsed | lapsed | making a bunch
native | advanced | intermediate | intermediate | basic | lapsed | lapsed | making a bunch
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6354
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Didn't the Amazon reverse direction because of the rise of the Andes?esoanem wrote: .... The main effect forcing river formation are orogeny ....
Isn't that the reason for vaquitas (fresh-water river dolphins) evolving in South America?
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Yep!eldin raigmore wrote:Didn't the Amazon reverse direction because of the rise of the Andes?esoanem wrote: .... The main effect forcing river formation are orogeny ....
Isn't that the reason for vaquitas (fresh-water river dolphins) evolving in South America?
(Picture below of open-mouthed bufeo, possibly not for the squeamish)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6354
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
After the Andes blocked the Amazon's route to the ocean, but before the Amazon finished reversing its course;
wasn't there a very big lake near the foothills of the Andes, fed by the Amazon?
And isn't that where/when the freshwater porpoises evolved?
wasn't there a very big lake near the foothills of the Andes, fed by the Amazon?
And isn't that where/when the freshwater porpoises evolved?
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
- LinguoFranco
- greek
- Posts: 615
- Joined: 20 Jul 2016 17:49
- Location: U.S.
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Is anyone else concerned that a conculture built from the ground up may be too similar to another IRL culture? I understand that some resemblance is inevitable due to environmental, religious, political, and cultural factors, I just want them to be different enough.
The current conculture I'm working on inhabits a river valley in a desert, and I'm afraid it may end up being too similar to ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia.
The current conculture I'm working on inhabits a river valley in a desert, and I'm afraid it may end up being too similar to ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia.
- gestaltist
- mayan
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: 11 Feb 2015 11:23
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
It's definitely my concern, yes. But there is also something to be said about derivation. If you intend to share that conculture with others in any form, it's way easier for people to relate to it than if it were completely foreign. I guess that's also the reason why so few conworlds don't have humans.LinguoFranco wrote:Is anyone else concerned that a conculture built from the ground up may be too similar to another IRL culture? I understand that some resemblance is inevitable due to environmental, religious, political, and cultural factors, I just want them to be different enough.
The current conculture I'm working on inhabits a river valley in a desert, and I'm afraid it may end up being too similar to ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia.
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
that would probably explain why, when the Octonauts' globe was shown (earth day special), there was a huge lake in that part of South America.eldin raigmore wrote:After the Andes blocked the Amazon's route to the ocean, but before the Amazon finished reversing its course;
wasn't there a very big lake near the foothills of the Andes, fed by the Amazon?
At work on Apaan: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4799
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
A newbie question, but still: if my language is generally VSO, and has postpositions, would it be classed as a head-initial language?
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5121
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: (C&C) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
So here is the non-newbie answer: It's not that easy. Most language are actually mixed and for a lot constructions/phrases linguists do not agree what the head is. Verb before object is usually considered head initial. Postpositions are condiderd head final, if you assume that postpositions are the head of a postpositional phrase.
So your languages is classified as mixed, as most languages, I would say.
Actually languages can exhibit another pattern of mixed-ness. German for example has a lot of prepositions, but some postpositions.
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics