Naturalism for Noobs
Re: Naturalism for Noobs
Sortof? Walman (Papua New Guinea) has a conjunction that inflects with the same subject and object agreement affixes as verbs, but (IIRC) not for tense, aspect, or mood.
Re: Naturalism for Noobs
Walman was what I was thinking, thanks! I don't know the specifics but from the article it doesn't seem that normal verbs inflect for TAM either, although I only skimmed it.
![[tick]](./images/smilies/tickic.png "Tick"){kind=small}
- 
![[:D]](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin2.png ":D"){kind=icon}
- :zho: ![[:'(]](./images/smilies/icon_crying2.png ":'("){kind=icon}
- 
Re: Naturalism for Noobs
Well there's this one at least...HoskhMatriarch wrote: I just realized that I said the opposite thing to what I meant. I mean the sum total of conlangs doesn't seem to have any (or at least many) conlangs with no dominant order :P
任何事物的发展都是物极必反，否极泰来。