Sound change and lenited forms

If you're new to these arts, this is the place to ask "stupid" questions and get directions!
Post Reply
Davush
greek
greek
Posts: 678
Joined: 10 Jan 2015 14:10

Sound change and lenited forms

Post by Davush »

Hello,

In a proto-language, an initial unvoiced consonant usually becomes voiced when a prefix is added to it, or between vowels. This means that roots beginning with an unvoiced initial appear as voiced in nearly all circumstances as the language is strongly prefixing. Prepositions and other grammatical words also cause voicing on nouns. This means that apart from at the beginning of an utterance, unvoiced consonants aren't that common.

In daughter languages would it be unusual for the roots to 'revert' to the unvoiced form given that they usually surface as voiced?


E.g.:
čēša- (to eat) when conjugated always surfaces as jēša (mjēša, šajēša, etc.). The only time this does not occur is when it is used as a nominal due to suffixing.

Although I am happy with this in the proto-language which has very few instances of unvoiced consonants between vowels, I do not want every root in daughter languages to being with a voiced consonant but I can't think of any plausible ways to 'reverse' this effect?

Any ideas or examples would be welcome.

Thanks.
User avatar
Man in Space
roman
roman
Posts: 1309
Joined: 03 Aug 2012 08:07
Location: Ohio

Re: Sound change and lenited forms

Post by Man in Space »

It would be unusual, yes. Unheard of, no—Kiput is thought to have gone through a devoicing of consonants between vowels at one point, but it's an incredibly rare change.

Incidentally, initial-consonant voicing across the board is actually a reasonable change.
Twin Aster megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO

CC = Common Caber
CK = Classical Khaya
CT = Classical Ĝare n Tim Ar
Kg = Kgáweq'
PB = Proto-Beheic
PO = Proto-O
PTa = Proto-Taltic
STK = Sisỏk Tlar Kyanà
Tm = Təmattwəspwaypksma
User avatar
Frislander
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2088
Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
Location: The North

Re: Sound change and lenited forms

Post by Frislander »

Linguifex wrote:It would be unusual, yes. Unheard of, no—Kiput is thought to have gone through a devoicing of consonants between vowels at one point, but it's an incredibly rare change.

Incidentally, initial-consonant voicing across the board is actually a reasonable change.
I'll second that, or alternatively invoke analogy.
Davush
greek
greek
Posts: 678
Joined: 10 Jan 2015 14:10

Re: Sound change and lenited forms

Post by Davush »

Thanks for the replies.

The proto-languages more or less already has initial voicing for all roots because a vowel or voiced consonant prefix causes voicing (which is how they surface 99% of the time). This means daughter-langs would not have any roots beginning with an unvoiced consonant. I am basically looking for a way to re-introduce the voiced/voiceless distinction word-initially.
clawgrip
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2257
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 07:33
Location: Tokyo

Re: Sound change and lenited forms

Post by clawgrip »

I assume then that š does not voice to to ž?

If you want to introduce more voiceless consonants, one thing you can do is give the language lexical stress and then have the consonants in unstressed syllables device.

Or you could have long vowels or something else cause prenasalization of stops, then devoice regular stops and then eliminate prenasalized stops.
User avatar
Man in Space
roman
roman
Posts: 1309
Joined: 03 Aug 2012 08:07
Location: Ohio

Re: Sound change and lenited forms

Post by Man in Space »

clawgrip wrote:If you want to introduce more voiceless consonants, one thing you can do is give the language lexical stress and then have the consonants in unstressed syllables device.
The opposite is actually more realistic—unstressed consonants voicing.
Twin Aster megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO

CC = Common Caber
CK = Classical Khaya
CT = Classical Ĝare n Tim Ar
Kg = Kgáweq'
PB = Proto-Beheic
PO = Proto-O
PTa = Proto-Taltic
STK = Sisỏk Tlar Kyanà
Tm = Təmattwəspwaypksma
Post Reply