Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

If you're new to these arts, this is the place to ask "stupid" questions and get directions!
Post Reply
Ehesh
rupestrian
rupestrian
Posts: 20
Joined: 06 Sep 2017 01:36

Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

Post by Ehesh »

I'm wondering if noun classes are limited to be only as prefix or suffix. For example Y have a gender variant class for male, female and animals. Male and Female are suffix while animal is prefix. So that way I could specify dog (without specifying gender) ngirru, a male dog Ngirrutse of a female dog ngirru'a

The class for animals is ng-

animal ng-/nga-
insect ngati
dog ngirru
cat ngako
bird ngitsirau
fish ngitishia
Last edited by Ehesh on 14 Oct 2017 01:37, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Ahzoh
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4191
Joined: 20 Oct 2013 02:57
Location: Canada

Re: Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

Post by Ahzoh »

Noun classes could also be infixes, circumfixes, or by ablaut.
Image Śād Warḫallun (Vrkhazhian) [ WIKI | CWS ]
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2945
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

Post by Dormouse559 »

Noun classes/genders can be marked any way that derivation is. So anything Ahzoh listed plus whatever you can think of. On a theoretical note, classes/genders are defined mainly by agreement of other words with nouns. Any marking on nouns that indicates or affects noun class is in fact derivation, not noun class itself.
User avatar
lsd
greek
greek
Posts: 740
Joined: 11 Mar 2011 21:11
Contact:

Re: Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

Post by lsd »

As a limit case, I told elsewhere, one can see my conlang as compound of class marks...
So any speech could be seen as just class marks...
nothing else...
In conlang anything is possible (even if anadew is probable...)
User avatar
eldin raigmore
korean
korean
Posts: 6352
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Are noun classes divided to be solely prefix/suffix?

Post by eldin raigmore »

Genders are concordial noun-classes.
The main thing about nouns' genders is, that other words (e.g. pronouns, articles, adjectives, adpositions, and sometimes even verbs) have to agree with them.

Noun-classes in general may not have to be agreed with.
For instance, in languages with numeral classifiers, the classifier used with a particular noun tells what its class is. But no other word has to agree with that class.
The language may also have, or may not have, gender.

There are also languages with possessive classifiers.
English has two kinds of possessive marking: "Usher's house" or "house of Usher".
In English there's little grammatical importance on the choice of which way of showing possession is used.
But in some languages, nouns are divided into two classes;
as if we could say "Usher's house" and "hound of Baskerville" but couldn't say "house of Usher" nor "Baskerville's hound", because "house" and "hound" were different classes.
But no other word has to agree with that class.
The language may also have, or may not have, gender.

Noun-classes in general, and especially genders in particular, don't have to be marked on the noun at all.
Post Reply