Silvish
Re: Silvish
The innovation of new genders without involving any classifiers is always neat.
Re: Silvish
I say yay. I can't think of a single romance language that's created more genders and I think that'd be a pretty cool and unique distinction to work into play.
Re: Silvish
Something similar happened in Swedish. When the case system collapsed, Central, Northern and Estern Swedish dialects generalized the accusative ending of old weak nouns. But many words were exempt, and these are usually animate, masculine, or otherwise prominent as subjects. So you'd get e.g. tima 'hour' and gato 'street' (< tími, gata, obl. tíma, gatu) but oxe 'ox' and bonde 'farmer' (< oxi, bóndi).Dormouse559 wrote:But the nouns that lost the accusative in Silvish are all human nouns or personal names. As a result, they're more likely to be subjects, and it's marked for them to not be. Considering that, I chose to have the marked case, the oblique, fill the role of the lost accusative. As a result, this set of nouns has nominative-accusative alignment.
In written Early Modern Swedish, there was a lot of confusion regarding these words (in particular the weak masculines) since the dialects above had a lot of influence. When the situation stabilized in the 18th century, the result was that most words kept the old nominative ending, but that a significant subset of words primarily denoting abstract things changed to the old accusative ending (other factors that probably played a role is low plural frequency and object preference). So in modern Swedish you have words ending in -e, such as mage 'stomach', hare 'hare', måne 'moon', lie 'scythe', buske 'bush', and you have words ending in -a, such as hetta 'heat', timma 'hour', låga 'flame', vilja 'desire' and blomma 'flower', all of whom originally belonged to the same declension.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
MrKrov wrote:The innovation of new genders without involving any classifiers is always neat.
Cool! I'm glad you like it. I'm still working out the implications of new genders, so we'll see if anything interesting comes of it.All4Ɇn wrote:I say yay. I can't think of a single romance language that's created more genders and I think that'd be a pretty cool and unique distinction to work into play.
I didn't know about that. It's always great knowing there's some precedent for what you're doing. Swedish looks like a mirror image of Silvish in terms of the case that ended up favored (nominative over accusative in Swedish, accusative over nominative in Silvish).Aszev wrote:Something similar happened in Swedish. ...
Re: Silvish
*loudly points at Learran* I beat him by only 7 hours.All4Ɇn wrote:I say yay. I can't think of a single romance language that's created more genders and I think that'd be a pretty cool and unique distinction to work into play.
Then again, it's not being analogized to the adjective system.
Anyways, I would vote nay on an issue like this, as a devil's advocate. Here are some issues that might arise.
1) this would become more of class system arguably.
2) You would need to analogize this change to the pronominal system.
3) I can't think of anything else, so if you're okay with this, then go forward!
Spoiler:
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
*Loudly points at Silvish* I published first.qwed117 wrote:*loudly points at Learran* I beat him by only 7 hours.
Then again, it's not being analogized to the adjective system.
Well, great minds and all that.
1) I'm not convinced there's a useful distinction to be made between "class" and "gender". I use "gender" to refer to all such systems. If you mean animacy would be involved, there are flavors of that, but so far, only a few nouns have gotten into the human-associated group, and there are many apparently arbitrary exclusions (e.g. "painter" is in, "sculptor" is out). To a certain extent, whether a noun gets in is a quirk of etymology. I could definitely see animacy catching on in an in-world future version of the language.qwed117 wrote:Anyways, I would vote nay on an issue like this, as a devil's advocate. Here are some issues that might arise.
1) this would become more of class system arguably.
2) You would need to analogize this change to the pronominal system.
3) I can't think of anything else, so if you're okay with this, then go forward!
2) I don't think so. Romance pronouns have generally resisted losing case distinctions, and there's no reason Silvish should be any different.
Re: Silvish
I mean that you'll have to make new genders in your 3rd person pronouns, to match it. Thats unless you want them to be fossilized in their VL forms. You'll also have to do the same to the articles.Dormouse559 wrote:qwed117 wrote:
2) I don't think so. Romance pronouns have generally resisted losing case distinctions, and there's no reason Silvish should be any different.
Spoiler:
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
I don't understand why I have to. I was planning on getting the articles in on this, but gender agreement doesn't have to be thoroughgoing. And remember that these genders only emerge from which of three cases is contrasted. In order to create agreement in the pronouns through analogy, I'd have to make it impossible to replace most nouns with the nominative third person pronoun.
Re: Silvish
I think German's Mädchen is the perfect example of why it's not necessary to do it. Even though it's a neuter noun it's typically referred to with feminine pronouns as it refers to females. Given that the nouns contrasted refer to people, I see no reason why users wouldn't just group them with the masculine and feminine pronouns corresponding to the gender of who it refers toDormouse559 wrote:I don't understand why I have to. I was planning on getting the articles in on this, but gender agreement doesn't have to be thoroughgoing. And remember that these genders only emerge from which of three cases is contrasted. In order to create agreement in the pronouns through analogy, I'd have to make it impossible to replace most nouns with the nominative third person pronoun.
Re: Silvish
I dunno if you're still taking suggestions for translational topics, but I'd like to suggest articles of clothing, and other objects associated with dressing.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
Sure! I did a clothing post earlier, and it's become quite outdated. I'll bring that up to date and add your terms in. Will let you know when I'm done.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
It's my five-year anniversary on the CBB. And as it happens, my reworked Silvish is starting to really flesh out, so I translated the UDHR to show what I'm working on.
La Decclarachò universelle deu·d drèt d'l'Ò
Touz le·z ettre umànt nesse libèrt e evvòt pa çou qui en l'e·d deuvi dignetæy e deu·d dræti. Li·z on d'ræzò e de conchanche e don·t ajî, le·z en-i aveû le·z ötri, aveû en-i eppriti de fraternetæ.
[la.dɛk.kla.ʁəˈɕo y.nivɛˈsɛl.lə dœˈdʁɛt ˈdlo]
[tu.zləˈzɛt.tʁə yˈmɑ̃t ˈnɛs.sə liˈbɛʁt e.ɛˈvɔt pa.su.kjɛ̃.lɛd.dø.vi.di.ɲəˈtɛː.ji e.dœˈdʁɛː.ti | li.zɔ̃.dʁɛˈzo e.de.kɔ̃ˈɕɑ.ɕə e.dɔ̃.təˈʑiː | ləˈzẽ.i əˈvøː ləˈzøː.tʁi | əˈvøː ẽ.jɛˈpʁi.ti de.fʁa.tɛʁ.nəˈtɛː]
DEF-F declaration universal-F of-DEF.PL right-PL of=DEF=man
all-PL.M.WK DEF-PL being human-PL.M.WK be_born-3PL free-PL.M.WK and equal-PL.M.WK for PRO REL-NOM PRO be.3SG of-DEF-OBL dignity-OBL and of-DEF-PL.OBL right-PL.OBL. 3PL.NOM have.3PL PART=reason and PART conscience and must-3PL act-INF DEF-PL one-PL.OBL with DEF-PL other-PL.OBL with INDEF-OBL.M.WK spirit-OBL of brotherhood
* WK = "weak" or non-human-associated gender
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Here are some of the changes I've made:
P.S. Sorry I never got to giving you the updated clothing terms, qwed. I think the overhaul kicked into high gear not long after you asked about them. I'll try to get to those soon. :)
La Decclarachò universelle deu·d drèt d'l'Ò
Touz le·z ettre umànt nesse libèrt e evvòt pa çou qui en l'e·d deuvi dignetæy e deu·d dræti. Li·z on d'ræzò e de conchanche e don·t ajî, le·z en-i aveû le·z ötri, aveû en-i eppriti de fraternetæ.
[la.dɛk.kla.ʁəˈɕo y.nivɛˈsɛl.lə dœˈdʁɛt ˈdlo]
[tu.zləˈzɛt.tʁə yˈmɑ̃t ˈnɛs.sə liˈbɛʁt e.ɛˈvɔt pa.su.kjɛ̃.lɛd.dø.vi.di.ɲəˈtɛː.ji e.dœˈdʁɛː.ti | li.zɔ̃.dʁɛˈzo e.de.kɔ̃ˈɕɑ.ɕə e.dɔ̃.təˈʑiː | ləˈzẽ.i əˈvøː ləˈzøː.tʁi | əˈvøː ẽ.jɛˈpʁi.ti de.fʁa.tɛʁ.nəˈtɛː]
DEF-F declaration universal-F of-DEF.PL right-PL of=DEF=man
all-PL.M.WK DEF-PL being human-PL.M.WK be_born-3PL free-PL.M.WK and equal-PL.M.WK for PRO REL-NOM PRO be.3SG of-DEF-OBL dignity-OBL and of-DEF-PL.OBL right-PL.OBL. 3PL.NOM have.3PL PART=reason and PART conscience and must-3PL act-INF DEF-PL one-PL.OBL with DEF-PL other-PL.OBL with INDEF-OBL.M.WK spirit-OBL of brotherhood
* WK = "weak" or non-human-associated gender
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Here are some of the changes I've made:
- The orthography is much more straightforward; silent consonants are gone. There are still some complications, but generally each letter has an impact on pronunciation, even if it doesn't have its prototypical value.
- Both vowel and consonant length are phonemic.
- I've become conscious of my fascination with vowel and consonant gradation, so I'm refining that aspect of the language with more intention.
- Ablaut is still a productive process, though there are a lot more words where the distinction has been neutralized.
- Emergent consonants are also still productive, but I've made them more systematic, and there are additionally some brand-new final consonants that change in declension and liaison (e.g. goùs [ˈgus] -> goutti [ˈgut.ti]).
- Certain words and morphemes now trigger the doubling of a following consonant (from UDHR: l'e [le] + deuvi [dø.vi] = l'e·d deuvi [lɛd.dø.vi]).
- The "complexes" (see 3.2.2.2 of the first post for my old description) that delimit all these gradation effects are now based on stress rather than grammar. A complex always ends on either a stressed syllable or on the unstressed syllable immediately following a stressed syllable. In turn, however, stress assignment does rely on grammar somewhat.
P.S. Sorry I never got to giving you the updated clothing terms, qwed. I think the overhaul kicked into high gear not long after you asked about them. I'll try to get to those soon. :)
Re: Silvish
Dormouse559
Joyeux anniversaire!It's my five-year anniversary on the CBB.
☯ 道可道,非常道
☯ 名可名,非常名
☯ 名可名,非常名
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
I finally got that clothing post updated for you. You should find the current versions of the vocabulary that was already there, plus the words from your list I hadn't translated yet. I seem to have lost the etymology of bogne, though. :S
If there are other topics someone is interested in seeing, I'd be glad to work on those.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
So while I work on the language, I'll go through and update the vocabulary posts. Here's the first one, all shiny and new. It's on basic conversation; if there are other phrases you'd like me to add, let me know.
In other news, I've settled on the French-like spellings I mentioned a couple posts back (<cou> /kw/, <qu gu> /k g/ before <i e>).
And in still other news, I've decided what to call the innovated genders. The gender with a distinct nominative shall henceforth be known as "noble" (or noblou in Silvish), and the gender with a distinct oblique as "common" (commé). The reasoning being that nearly all nouns for members of the nobility and royalty ended up in the former gender, and some kiss-up grammarian couldn't resist a bit of flattery.
In other news, I've settled on the French-like spellings I mentioned a couple posts back (<cou> /kw/, <qu gu> /k g/ before <i e>).
And in still other news, I've decided what to call the innovated genders. The gender with a distinct nominative shall henceforth be known as "noble" (or noblou in Silvish), and the gender with a distinct oblique as "common" (commé). The reasoning being that nearly all nouns for members of the nobility and royalty ended up in the former gender, and some kiss-up grammarian couldn't resist a bit of flattery.
Re: Silvish
Excellent choice. Before I decided on my current idea, one of my many romlang ideas was to also derive an additional two genders from Old French's case system.Dormouse559 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017 08:07 So while I work on the language, I'll go through and update the vocabulary posts. Here's the first one, all shiny and new. It's on basic conversation; if there are other phrases you'd like me to add, let me know.
In other news, I've settled on the French-like spellings I mentioned a couple posts back (<cou> /kw/, <qu gu> /k g/ before <i e>).
And in still other news, I've decided what to call the innovated genders. The gender with a distinct nominative shall henceforth be known as "noble" (or noblou in Silvish), and the gender with a distinct oblique as "common" (commè). The reasoning being that nearly all nouns for members of the nobility and royalty ended up in the former gender, and some kiss-up grammarian couldn't resist a bit of flattery.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
Conlang idea buddies! Most of the major Romance languages are so neatly conformist with their genders, so it's fun to innovate some variety.
Let's see. I've now updated the "around the house" and computer vocabulary posts.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Silvish
I feel bad making all these updates over and over again. Really, the language is all there in my head. It's just taking the time to write everything out that I have trouble with. And then by the time I get started, I'm already changing things, and since the whole thing is an interlocking mass of moving parts, that sends changes through the entire system. Gaming out the changes is intellectually stimulating on my end, but I'm sure it's no fun to keep straight for anyone else at all interested in Silvish.
I've given the first post another makeover. It accurately reflects Silvish as I conceive of it at 3:30 PM PDT on July 25, 2018. Who knows how long it stays current. A lot of the changes I mentioned in my last update are still relevant, though the orthography has changed.
I now refer to the "complexes" as "chains", because when I really thought about what the native Silvish word for the related phenomena might be, I remembered the French term enchaînement (basically "concatenation"). So i went with that chain metaphor.
The first post has been restructured; I realized that after the simplification of the orthography, I could retire the "orthophonology" section. Seeing asI'm a packrat the reformatting was larger than the previous edits I've made, I kept the old text in a spoiler at the bottom of the post.
I'm sure the post could be clearer. If you notice anything confusing or interesting, let me know. I'd be glad to talk about it.
I've given the first post another makeover. It accurately reflects Silvish as I conceive of it at 3:30 PM PDT on July 25, 2018. Who knows how long it stays current. A lot of the changes I mentioned in my last update are still relevant, though the orthography has changed.
I now refer to the "complexes" as "chains", because when I really thought about what the native Silvish word for the related phenomena might be, I remembered the French term enchaînement (basically "concatenation"). So i went with that chain metaphor.
The first post has been restructured; I realized that after the simplification of the orthography, I could retire the "orthophonology" section. Seeing as
I'm sure the post could be clearer. If you notice anything confusing or interesting, let me know. I'd be glad to talk about it.
Re: Silvish
Trust me, you aren't the only one struggling here. Pelsodian has changed many forms, from an originally agglutinative Turkish inspired romlang to something more realistically in line with Romance dialectology as of the same date. And the more I read (I just bought a book on Vegliote Dalmatian and Rhetoromance), the more I want to change things!Dormouse559 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2018 00:30 I feel bad making all these updates over and over again. Really, the language is all there in my head. It's just taking the time to write everything out that I have trouble with. And then by the time I get started, I'm already changing things, and since the whole thing is an interlocking mass of moving parts, that sends changes through the entire system. Gaming out the changes is intellectually stimulating on my end, but I'm sure it's no fun to keep straight for anyone else at all interested in Silvish.
The new developments in Silvish are interesting. They remind me somewhat of Ligurian, tbh.