Collabromlang
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
85) CDBAE
86) B
87) A
88) B
86) B
87) A
88) B
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5091
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: Collabromlang
I ust thought of a different solution for this. How about making these words very frequent? ffalmu could have a semantic shift to mean song, sound, voice, ffalírju could become musical instrument > tool. palimpsestus would become document and the prefix pseudo could also be used with verbs in the sense of mis-.cedh wrote:- The changes p/˦/V_[sʃ] followed by p[ʃs]/ff/_ have been voted for, but they don't make much sense in this combination IMO, because /ps/ almost always appears after vowels. In www.perseus.tufts.edu I have found only four words of reasonable frequency that would be affected by our second rule: psalmus > ffalmu, psalterium > ffalírju, palimpsestus > palimffìθ, and the prefix pseudo- > ffiuda-.
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
I like that idea alot! It would be interesting to see it in action.Creyeditor wrote:I ust thought of a different solution for this. How about making these words very frequent? ffalmu could have a semantic shift to mean song, sound, voice, ffalírju could become musical instrument > tool. palimpsestus would become document and the prefix pseudo could also be used with verbs in the sense of mis-.cedh wrote:- The changes p/˦/V_[sʃ] followed by p[ʃs]/ff/_ have been voted for, but they don't make much sense in this combination IMO, because /ps/ almost always appears after vowels. In www.perseus.tufts.edu I have found only four words of reasonable frequency that would be affected by our second rule: psalmus > ffalmu, psalterium > ffalírju, palimpsestus > palimffìθ, and the prefix pseudo- > ffiuda-.
Re: Collabromlang
Yes, I like it too.gokupwned5 wrote:I like that idea alot! It would be interesting to see it in action.Creyeditor wrote:I ust thought of a different solution for this. How about making these words very frequent? ffalmu could have a semantic shift to mean song, sound, voice, ffalírju could become musical instrument > tool. palimpsestus would become document and the prefix pseudo could also be used with verbs in the sense of mis-.cedh wrote:- The changes p/˦/V_[sʃ] followed by p[ʃs]/ff/_ have been voted for, but they don't make much sense in this combination IMO, because /ps/ almost always appears after vowels. In www.perseus.tufts.edu I have found only four words of reasonable frequency that would be affected by our second rule: psalmus > ffalmu, psalterium > ffalírju, palimpsestus > palimffìθ, and the prefix pseudo- > ffiuda-.
However, my point was that the specific combination of sound changes does not make too much sense. IMHO we have assembled a couple of changes that seem fine individually, but do not give the phonological history of this language a coherent feel. My suggestion to simplify all geminates with tonal effects was aimed to reduce this kind of haphazardness a bit. An alternative option would be to shift all /ps/ to /ff/ (except possibly word-finally and/or after a consonant), and then keep geminate consonants. But if /ff/ is the only word-initial geminate (which it currently is), it's still likely to simplify in that position, so if we choose that route, we should probably reduce other clusters similarly to get other word-initial geminates.
In other words, I'd consider it a good idea to (a) do some cleanup before proceeding, and then (b) to write voting proposals in such a way that they feel systematic (i.e. a rule like p/˦/V_[sʃ] is probably too specific unless we want to clean up a few unwanted clusters after applying other, more systematic sound changes; better rules would look like e.g. [-voiced]/˦/V_[sʃ] or [+plosive][sʃ]/[+fricative+long]/_)
Blog: audmanh.wordpress.com
Conlangs: Ronc Tyu | Buruya Nzaysa | Doayâu | Tmaśareʔ
Conlangs: Ronc Tyu | Buruya Nzaysa | Doayâu | Tmaśareʔ
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
I see your point.cedh wrote:Yes, I like it too.gokupwned5 wrote:I like that idea alot! It would be interesting to see it in action.Creyeditor wrote:I ust thought of a different solution for this. How about making these words very frequent? ffalmu could have a semantic shift to mean song, sound, voice, ffalírju could become musical instrument > tool. palimpsestus would become document and the prefix pseudo could also be used with verbs in the sense of mis-.cedh wrote:- The changes p/˦/V_[sʃ] followed by p[ʃs]/ff/_ have been voted for, but they don't make much sense in this combination IMO, because /ps/ almost always appears after vowels. In www.perseus.tufts.edu I have found only four words of reasonable frequency that would be affected by our second rule: psalmus > ffalmu, psalterium > ffalírju, palimpsestus > palimffìθ, and the prefix pseudo- > ffiuda-.
However, my point was that the specific combination of sound changes does not make too much sense. IMHO we have assembled a couple of changes that seem fine individually, but do not give the phonological history of this language a coherent feel. My suggestion to simplify all geminates with tonal effects was aimed to reduce this kind of haphazardness a bit. An alternative option would be to shift all /ps/ to /ff/ (except possibly word-finally and/or after a consonant), and then keep geminate consonants. But if /ff/ is the only word-initial geminate (which it currently is), it's still likely to simplify in that position, so if we choose that route, we should probably reduce other clusters similarly to get other word-initial geminates.
In other words, I'd consider it a good idea to (a) do some cleanup before proceeding, and then (b) to write voting proposals in such a way that they feel systematic (i.e. a rule like p/˦/V_[sʃ] is probably too specific unless we want to clean up a few unwanted clusters after applying other, more systematic sound changes; better rules would look like e.g. [-voiced]/˦/V_[sʃ] or [+plosive][sʃ]/[+fricative+long]/_)
Re: Collabromlang
Ok, looking at cedh's comment, I have a few comments to make on it
SANCTUS appears to have been derived from a hypothetical *santum in all Romance languages. That's why Romanian gives sânt instead of *sâmt. Aromanian appears to have sãmtu with the mt as a reflex of nct, but the definition below gives a relatively succinct explanation for why *santum should still be preferred: nt (sentio) became mt (sãmtu) regularly in Aromanian. *santum thus gives san'a˦u or more likely san'aw˦
I've added the new Greek simplifications into the most recent batch at the bottom; I don't think it's fully updated yet though. Someone else should check to make sure (probably you, given how much I'm relying on you now )
I think I'll take executive action on the ps > ff change. One f it shall be
I don't know if you intended to use the nominative form of urbs, but the nominative form is only rarely transferred on to the descendants of a language. Only some varieties of Rumansch use the nominative wholesale. In most cases it's just one or two words that use the nominative for derivation, like hom in French.
Thank you for commenting on the progress; I know it's been nearly half a year since I touched this, but thank you for your continued patience in dealing with me. I'd like to apologize for being so slow on this thread, but unfortunately there still isn't much that I can do to stop that.
Criticism Updated but not Actually updated Diachronics
Looking at the sound changes themselves ADOPTARE should become ada˦w'a˦ra, it seems that stress hasn't been conditioned in. I haven't looked back at the vote, but it's probable that stress wasn't meant to become a factor, like you noted.cedh wrote:I've had a look at the sound changes and their outcomes, and I have a few comments:
- We need a few clean-up rules. For instance, adop'tare currently gives ada˦w'ta˨r (or ada˦wa˦ra if the stress is not explicitly marked), which should probably be adau˦'ta˨r instead, and 'sanctus gives 'sanxtu, which should probably be either 'sanxu˦ or 'sanku˦.
SANCTUS appears to have been derived from a hypothetical *santum in all Romance languages. That's why Romanian gives sânt instead of *sâmt. Aromanian appears to have sãmtu with the mt as a reflex of nct, but the definition below gives a relatively succinct explanation for why *santum should still be preferred: nt (sentio) became mt (sãmtu) regularly in Aromanian. *santum thus gives san'a˦u or more likely san'aw˦
I've added the new Greek simplifications into the most recent batch at the bottom; I don't think it's fully updated yet though. Someone else should check to make sure (probably you, given how much I'm relying on you now )
I think I'll take executive action on the ps > ff change. One f it shall be
I don't know if you intended to use the nominative form of urbs, but the nominative form is only rarely transferred on to the descendants of a language. Only some varieties of Rumansch use the nominative wholesale. In most cases it's just one or two words that use the nominative for derivation, like hom in French.
Thank you for commenting on the progress; I know it's been nearly half a year since I touched this, but thank you for your continued patience in dealing with me. I'd like to apologize for being so slow on this thread, but unfortunately there still isn't much that I can do to stop that.
Criticism Updated but not Actually updated Diachronics
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
It's alright! I could try spreading awareness of the thread tomorrow to increase the pace.
Re: Collabromlang
It's not you, it's me. I'm not exactly up to making continuous posts until mid May, at best. I'll try to get a new set of questions. It'll all be clean up though.gokupwned5 wrote:It's alright! I could try spreading awareness of the thread tomorrow to increase the pace.
Spoiler:
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Collabromlang
Not in all. French at least doesn't bear that out. It has "saint" /sɛ̃/, which implies some kind of palatalization/raising effect from the /k/. Without it, you'd get "sant" /sɑ̃/.qwed117 wrote:SANCTUS appears to have been derived from a hypothetical *santum in all Romance languages.
Re: Collabromlang
It seems that French (and derived languages) is merely an outlier. In Spanish you'd expect something along the lines of sentu/senchu/sanchu. In Romanian, you would expect sâmpt or sâmt. The only other language that appears to have some trace of the medial k is Ladin, with sent.Dormouse559 wrote:Not in all. French at least doesn't bear that out. It has "saint" /sɛ̃/, which implies some kind of palatalization/raising effect from the /k/. Without it, you'd get "sant" /sɑ̃/.qwed117 wrote:SANCTUS appears to have been derived from a hypothetical *santum in all Romance languages.
Spoiler:
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
In Spanish, the form is santo.
- Dormouse559
- moderator
- Posts: 2945
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
- Location: California
Re: Collabromlang
And some Arpitan dialects. I'd wager Romansh, too; Wiktionary gives sontg, sogn, sench. Might it be an areal feature? These languages are grouped together pretty neatly.qwed117 wrote:The only other language that appears to have some trace of the medial k is Ladin, with sent.
Re: Collabromlang
Could be. I assumed that tg was the normal result of t in front of front vowels, but that doesn't look to be the case regarding civitas, my go to word for tF combinations. Marcau has martgo from mercatus (assuming a shift to merctum in the latter)Dormouse559 wrote:And some Arpitan dialects. I'd wager Romansh, too; Wiktionary gives sontg, sogn, sench. Might it be an areal feature? These languages are grouped together pretty neatly.qwed117 wrote:The only other language that appears to have some trace of the medial k is Ladin, with sent.
Spoiler:
Re: Collabromlang
Like I said, it may be wise to entrust someone else to continue the romlang when you are unable to commit.
Or, perhaps people can suggest options to be voted upon.
Or, perhaps people can suggest options to be voted upon.
Re: Collabromlang
I'm 100% on board for others to continue the romlang creation. I would say though to leave the scenario stuff out, because different writers makes a whole lot different of a situation.Ælfwine wrote:Like I said, it may be wise to entrust someone else to continue the romlang when you are unable to commit.
Or, perhaps people can suggest options to be voted upon.
And I'm always open for people to give new proposals; whether by posting in this thread or pming me or the other "owner".
Spoiler:
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
I would be willing! I am available every week day from 15:00 to 16:00 EST and on weekends I am available all day. I have enough time to continue the thread at a faster pace.
Re: Collabromlang
I think we should have some sort of rotation, or something that allows multiple people to take the helm of the project. I would also ask that I have time to sort of "teach" the SCA2 rules, question formats or such to the new director, so they can pass it on to the next, and so on.gokupwned5 wrote:I would be willing! I am available every week day from 15:00 to 16:00 EST and on weekends I am available all day. I have enough time to continue the thread at a faster pace.
We should add something so that a poorly worded question can be thrown out.
Spoiler:
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Collabromlang
We could do a quick recap listing all the sound changes thus far as well as any loan words or migration that occurred.