Anglo-Romance Language Collab

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Ashtăr Balynestjăr
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 Jan 2017 07:17

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Ashtăr Balynestjăr »

b
[ˈaʃt̪əɹ ˈbalɨˌnɛsʲtʲəɹ]
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 315
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Esneirra973 »

b
IEPH
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 May 2016 00:40

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by IEPH »

33. a
Cavaliers327
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 132
Joined: 14 Mar 2017 23:21

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Cavaliers327 »

gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 315
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Esneirra973 »

Cavaliers327 wrote: 08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
I will, but in a new thread.
shimobaatar
korean
korean
Posts: 10373
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by shimobaatar »

gokupwned5 wrote: 03 Aug 2018 17:37
Cavaliers327 wrote: 08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
I will, but in a new thread.
Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 315
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Esneirra973 »

shimobaatar wrote: 03 Aug 2018 19:24
gokupwned5 wrote: 03 Aug 2018 17:37
Cavaliers327 wrote: 08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
I will, but in a new thread.
Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.
At this point, I really don't know what direction to take this thread in, and I've already started a new one.
Salmoneus
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3033
Joined: 19 Sep 2011 19:37

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Salmoneus »

shimobaatar wrote: 03 Aug 2018 19:24
gokupwned5 wrote: 03 Aug 2018 17:37
Cavaliers327 wrote: 08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
I will, but in a new thread.
Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.
Yeah, but the whole point of this sort of thread is to spend a lot of time and not make any progress, so...

[because if you do make progress, you get to bits that require thought and aren't so supeficial, which is harder to vote on like this. Particularly because people make these threads because they don't have a particular conlang idea of their own - but after a certain point, you need to have your own ideas even if it's just to suggest things, so the threadfounder will always decide they "don't know what direction to take this in" and start again. Some cycles just last longer than others.]
Esneirra973
sinic
sinic
Posts: 315
Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by Esneirra973 »

Salmoneus wrote: 03 Aug 2018 20:43
shimobaatar wrote: 03 Aug 2018 19:24
gokupwned5 wrote: 03 Aug 2018 17:37
Cavaliers327 wrote: 08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
I will, but in a new thread.
Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.
Yeah, but the whole point of this sort of thread is to spend a lot of time and not make any progress, so...

[because if you do make progress, you get to bits that require thought and aren't so supeficial, which is harder to vote on like this. Particularly because people make these threads because they don't have a particular conlang idea of their own - but after a certain point, you need to have your own ideas even if it's just to suggest things, so the threadfounder will always decide they "don't know what direction to take this in" and start again. Some cycles just last longer than others.]
I also haven't actually done anything with it in over a year.
User avatar
k1234567890y
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2400
Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
Contact:

Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab

Post by k1234567890y »

33. b
I prefer to not be referred to with masculine pronouns and nouns such as “he/him/his”.
Post Reply