Anglo-Romance Language Collab
-
- cuneiform
- Posts: 195
- Joined: 18 Jan 2017 07:17
-
- cuneiform
- Posts: 132
- Joined: 14 Mar 2017 23:21
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
I will, but in a new thread.Cavaliers327 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.gokupwned5 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 17:37I will, but in a new thread.Cavaliers327 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
The user formerly known as "shimobaatar".
(she)
(she)
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
At this point, I really don't know what direction to take this thread in, and I've already started a new one.shimobaatar wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 19:24Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.gokupwned5 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 17:37I will, but in a new thread.Cavaliers327 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
Yeah, but the whole point of this sort of thread is to spend a lot of time and not make any progress, so...shimobaatar wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 19:24Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.gokupwned5 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 17:37I will, but in a new thread.Cavaliers327 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
[because if you do make progress, you get to bits that require thought and aren't so supeficial, which is harder to vote on like this. Particularly because people make these threads because they don't have a particular conlang idea of their own - but after a certain point, you need to have your own ideas even if it's just to suggest things, so the threadfounder will always decide they "don't know what direction to take this in" and start again. Some cycles just last longer than others.]
-
- sinic
- Posts: 315
- Joined: 12 Aug 2016 16:05
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
I also haven't actually done anything with it in over a year.Salmoneus wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 20:43Yeah, but the whole point of this sort of thread is to spend a lot of time and not make any progress, so...shimobaatar wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 19:24Might I ask why? We made a lot of progress in this thread.gokupwned5 wrote: ↑03 Aug 2018 17:37I will, but in a new thread.Cavaliers327 wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018 17:52 gokupwned5, you should revive this thread. It was really interesting.
[because if you do make progress, you get to bits that require thought and aren't so supeficial, which is harder to vote on like this. Particularly because people make these threads because they don't have a particular conlang idea of their own - but after a certain point, you need to have your own ideas even if it's just to suggest things, so the threadfounder will always decide they "don't know what direction to take this in" and start again. Some cycles just last longer than others.]
- k1234567890y
- mayan
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
- Contact:
Re: Anglo-Romance Language Collab
33. b
I prefer to not be referred to with masculine pronouns and nouns such as “he/him/his”.