American English Derived Collablang!

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Nachtuil
greek
greek
Posts: 595
Joined: 21 Jul 2016 00:16

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by Nachtuil »

Edit: Somehow I missed the first part of the post? Am I going crazy? haha
1a:
Velars: A
Nasals: B
Sibilants: B
h: A
ł: C

1c: A
1e: A

Its extremely tempting, to, if we go with palatals, to fill out all the spots with the same type (ʲ) of secondary articulation.
Last edited by Nachtuil on 08 Mar 2018 23:32, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kiwikami
roman
roman
Posts: 1203
Joined: 26 May 2012 17:24
Location: Oh, I don't know, I'm probably around here somewhere.

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by kiwikami »

1a: A for all except D for the sibilants
1c: A
1e: B
Edit: Substituted a string instrument for a French interjection.

:eng: :mrgreen: | :fra: [:)] | ASL [:S] | :deu: [:|] | :tan: [:(] | :nav: [:'(]
vo1dwalk3r
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 108
Joined: 17 Mar 2014 22:37
Location: dʰǵʰémi
Contact:

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by vo1dwalk3r »

1a.
velars: B
nasals: A
sibilants: D
/h/: A
/l/: B

1c. A

1e. A
shimobaatar
korean
korean
Posts: 10373
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by shimobaatar »

4 (1a velars): c (k g > t͡ʃ d͡ʒ)
5 (1a nasals): b
6 (1a sibilants): b
7 (1a /h/): a
8 (1a /ɫ/): c
9 (1c): c (p t k b d g > b~bʲ d~d͡ʒ g~d͡ʒ v~vʲ ð~j ɣ~j)
10 (1e): b
idov
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 125
Joined: 13 Apr 2015 21:02

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by idov »

1a. Velars:B
Nasals:C (Apparently it has happened in Lealao Chinantec)
Sibilants: D
h:A
l:A
1c. A
1e. A
The accusative of <emo> is <eminem>. :lat:
Cavaliers327
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 132
Joined: 14 Mar 2017 23:21

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by Cavaliers327 »

1a.
Velars : B
Nasals: B
Sibilants: D
With H: A
With l: C

1c: B

1e. B
User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by CarsonDaConlanger »

The Internet at my house is broken [:'(] , and I have a forensics tournament tomorrow, so the next round of voting will be put off until further notice.
He/they bisexual weeb
shimobaatar
korean
korean
Posts: 10373
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by shimobaatar »

No worries! Take all the time you need.
User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by CarsonDaConlanger »

Thanks for the patience! The internet is working and our lang is now rolin'!

The results for the last round of voting are as follows:
k,g>kʲ,gʲ/_E
n,ŋ>ɲ/_E
*s,z>ʃ,ʒ/_E
*ʃ,ʒ>ɕ,ʑ/_E*
h>ç/_E
ł>ʎ/_E
b,d,g>ʋ,ð,ɣ/V_V
f,θ,s,ʃ,ɕ>ʋ,ð,z,ʒ,ʑ/V_V
h>Ø/V_V
v,w>ʋ
ɾ>r(tap to trill for those who have trouble reading it)

*this may need to be worked on more do to there essentially being a phonemic difference between ʃ and ʃ (and ʒ and ʒ) now.

Now for the next round of voting:
1: s/z/ʃ/ʒ/ɕ/ʑ
Should we
A) Have ʃ,ʒ>ɕ,ʑ unconditionally, then have s,z>ʃ,ʒ/_E
B) Something else
C) Leave it
2: θs/ðz
Should they
A) change to ts,dz
B) reduce to θ,ð
C) reduce to s,z
D) something else
E) leave them
3: Rhotics Pt1
What should happen to clusters of rɹ as in the new form of water: ʋɑrɹ̩?
A) merge them to r:
B) drop the ɹ̩
C) drop the r
D) insert a ǝ
E) something else
F) leave it
4: Rhotics Pt2
Should we palatalize r and ɹ?
A) yes
B) no
C) r but not ɹ
D) ɹ but not r
5: h between vowels
Should h>Ø/V_V occur before or after palatalization?
A) before: dahi>dai
B) after: dahi>daçi
6: clusters
Should clusters of non palatalized/palatalized consonants be allowed?
A) no antʰʲi>aɲtʰʲi
B) not in the same syllable stʰʲił>sʲtʰʲił
C) yes
7: ʎ and j
Should ʎ and j merge in front of a front vowel(or depending on 6 a palatalized consonant)?
A) yes jɛs>ʎɛs
B) no
Finally 8: should j palatalize the preceding consonant?
A) yes
B) no
He/they bisexual weeb
shimobaatar
korean
korean
Posts: 10373
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by shimobaatar »

1: c
2: b
3: d
4: b
5: a
6: a
7: b
8: a
Ælfwine
roman
roman
Posts: 940
Joined: 21 Sep 2015 01:28
Location: New Jersey

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by Ælfwine »

1. C
2. C
3. E - insert schwa and then drop ɹ̩
4. D
5. B
6. A
7. B
8. B
My Blog

A-posteriori, alternative history nerd
vo1dwalk3r
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 108
Joined: 17 Mar 2014 22:37
Location: dʰǵʰémi
Contact:

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by vo1dwalk3r »

1. C
2. C
3. E (Ælfwine's suggestion)
4. B
5. A
6. B
7. B
8. A
Nachtuil
greek
greek
Posts: 595
Joined: 21 Jul 2016 00:16

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by Nachtuil »

Will these sound changes be implemented in order or simultaneously?
User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by CarsonDaConlanger »

Nachtuil wrote: 12 Mar 2018 20:28 Will these sound changes be implemented in order or simultaneously?
In order.

I am suspending the vote count till tomorrow morning, partially because I am lazy, and partially because we need more votes.
He/they bisexual weeb
idov
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 125
Joined: 13 Apr 2015 21:02

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by idov »

1. C
2. B
3. (Ælfwine's suggestion)
4. C
5. B
6. B
7. B
8. A
The accusative of <emo> is <eminem>. :lat:
User avatar
spanick
roman
roman
Posts: 1336
Joined: 11 May 2017 01:47
Location: California

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by spanick »

1. A
2. C (but they become geminates)
3. E (Ælfwine's suggestion)
4. D
5. B
6. A
7. B
8. A
User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by CarsonDaConlanger »

Sorry guys for the delay, got busy. The results are in, and now we have the following changes:
1(C)Nothing will happen to the sybillants.
2(C)θs,ðz>s:z:
3(E)rɹ̩>rǝ
4(B)nothing happens, no palatalization of rhotics
5(B)h>Ø/V_O, h>ç/V_E
6(A)CCʲ>CʲCʲ
7(B)Nothing
8(A)Cj>Cʲj

Now back to vowels.
1 Should we have a major vowel shift?
A: Yes, towards more vowels
B: Yes, towards fewer/roughly the same amount of vowels
C: No
2 Should we monophthongize eɩ oʊ?
A: Yes, to e: o:
B: Yes, to e o
C: No
3 Should we monophthongize aɩ aʊ ɔɩ ju?
A: Yes all
B: Only aɩ
C: Only aʊ
D: Only ɔɩ
E: Only ju
F: A combination of BCDE(say which)
G: No
He/they bisexual weeb
vo1dwalk3r
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 108
Joined: 17 Mar 2014 22:37
Location: dʰǵʰémi
Contact:

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by vo1dwalk3r »

1. B
2. B
3. B

Are we using Canadian raising?
User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by CarsonDaConlanger »

No, just GA diphthongs for now.
He/they bisexual weeb
shimobaatar
korean
korean
Posts: 10373
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
Location: UTC-04:00

Re: American English Derived Collablang!

Post by shimobaatar »

1: b
2: a
3: f ([aɪ̯] and [aʊ̯])

Why do the question numbers go back to 1 every round? Just a personal preference of the organizer?
Post Reply