Attempts of a new collablang
- k1234567890y
- mayan
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
- Contact:
Attempts of a new collablang
gotta make a new attempt of collaborative a priori lang.
Below are the votes:
1) size of consonant inventories?
a. small(14 consonants or less)
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
c. average(19-25 consonants)
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)
e. large(34 consonants or more)
2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
c. large(7 vowels or more)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
a. No voicing constrast
b. In plosives alone
c. In fricatives alone
d. In both plosives and fricatives
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
b. Uvular stops only
c. Uvular continuants only
d. Uvular stops and continuants
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
b. Ejectives onl
c. Implosives only
d. Glottalized resonants only
e. Ejectives and implosives
f. Ejectives and glottalized resonants
g. Implosives and glottalized resonants
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
a. No laterals
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
c. Laterals, but no /l/, no obstruent laterals
d. /l/ and lateral obstruent
e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
b. No initial velar nasal
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes
b. No
Below are the votes:
1) size of consonant inventories?
a. small(14 consonants or less)
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
c. average(19-25 consonants)
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)
e. large(34 consonants or more)
2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
c. large(7 vowels or more)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
a. No voicing constrast
b. In plosives alone
c. In fricatives alone
d. In both plosives and fricatives
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
b. Uvular stops only
c. Uvular continuants only
d. Uvular stops and continuants
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
b. Ejectives onl
c. Implosives only
d. Glottalized resonants only
e. Ejectives and implosives
f. Ejectives and glottalized resonants
g. Implosives and glottalized resonants
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
a. No laterals
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
c. Laterals, but no /l/, no obstruent laterals
d. /l/ and lateral obstruent
e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
b. No initial velar nasal
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes
b. No
I prefer to not be referred to with masculine pronouns and nouns such as “he/him/his”.
-
- korean
- Posts: 10373
- Joined: 12 Jul 2013 23:09
- Location: UTC-04:00
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
1: b
2: b
3: b
4: b
5: a
6: d
7: a
8: a
2: b
3: b
4: b
5: a
6: d
7: a
8: a
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
c. large(7 vowels or more)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
c. In fricatives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
c. large(7 vowels or more)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
c. In fricatives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
My neurochemistry has fucked my impulse control, now I'm diagnosed OOD = oppositional opinion disorder, one of the most deadly diseases in totalitarian states, but can be cured in the free world.
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
1) e.
2) a.
3) a.
4) a.
5) e.
6) Is having several laterals, none of them obstruent, an option? Example: /l ʎ/ If not: a.
7) b.
2) a.
3) a.
4) a.
5) e.
6) Is having several laterals, none of them obstruent, an option? Example: /l ʎ/ If not: a.
7) b.
The accusative of <emo> is <eminem>.
- k1234567890y
- mayan
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
- Contact:
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
it is counted as b.
I prefer to not be referred to with masculine pronouns and nouns such as “he/him/his”.
- gestaltist
- mayan
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: 11 Feb 2015 11:23
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
I like to vote on these threads. Although they usually die sooner than I would like.
My votes:
1e
2a
3c
4a
5h
6d
7a
8a
My votes:
1e
2a
3c
4a
5h
6d
7a
8a
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
Contact me when we get to semantics, syntax, or morphology.
Click here to join the Common Honey server. Or click here for a general glossopoeia server.
-
- cuneiform
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 14 Aug 2018 06:33
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
I hope this is still going.
1: C~D~E
2: A~B
3: A~C
4: D
5: A~B~F
6: D (Does this include glottalized L if we get glottalized resonants?)
7: B~C
8: B
Sorry if these are too vague.
1: C~D~E
2: A~B
3: A~C
4: D
5: A~B~F
6: D (Does this include glottalized L if we get glottalized resonants?)
7: B~C
8: B
Sorry if these are too vague.
-
- sinic
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 21 Jul 2012 08:01
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
My votes:
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
d. Uvular stops and continuants
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No
(it should, essentially, be the proto-language. we will introduce rules such that it shall have an underlying structure reflecting a more regular earlier stage, discernible through internal reconstruction, and a surface structure reflecting its present-day stage.)
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
d. Uvular stops and continuants
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No
(it should, essentially, be the proto-language. we will introduce rules such that it shall have an underlying structure reflecting a more regular earlier stage, discernible through internal reconstruction, and a surface structure reflecting its present-day stage.)
- CarsonDaConlanger
- sinic
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
Where are we at on this? Could we tally the votes and move on?
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No
He/they bisexual weeb
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
1) d
2) b
3) b
4) b
5) b
6) c
7) c
8) b
2) b
3) b
4) b
5) b
6) c
7) c
8) b
-
- greek
- Posts: 583
- Joined: 19 Mar 2016 04:14
- Location: Australia
Re: Attempts of a new collablang
1) size of consonant inventories?
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
d. In both plosives and fricatives
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes
Hit me up when we get past this voting.
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)
2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)
3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
d. In both plosives and fricatives
4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants
6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal
8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes
Hit me up when we get past this voting.
A signature.