Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread [2011–2018]
-
- sinic
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 21 Jul 2012 08:01
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
A kinda minimalistic thing inspired by Old Saxon and West Germanic more generally:
Phonemes/Pre-Stage
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d g/
/f s x/
/r/
/a e i o u/
Syllable structure: (C)(r)V(N)
Allophony/sound changes
First stage
All voiceless stops are aspirated; /r/ after a voiceless stop becomes voiceless.
Nasals assimilate to the place of the following consonant.
Identical voiced stops in successive syllables dissimilate; e.g. [bebe] > [bepe]
Second stage
[g] > [j] before front vowels
Word-medial stops geminate before /r/
Non-geminate /b d g f s/ > [v ð ɣ v z] postvocalically
/g/ > [ɣ] word-initially
Intervocalic /x/ > [h]
All consonants devoice word-finally
/k/ > [ts] before front vowels
I was going to make coda [ɣ] > [ː] be a change but then I realized the phonotactics were too simple
Examples:
/kilisa/ > [tsiliza]
/ungro/ > [uŋggro]
/dadum/ > [daðum̥]
Phonemes/Pre-Stage
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d g/
/f s x/
/r/
/a e i o u/
Syllable structure: (C)(r)V(N)
Allophony/sound changes
First stage
All voiceless stops are aspirated; /r/ after a voiceless stop becomes voiceless.
Nasals assimilate to the place of the following consonant.
Identical voiced stops in successive syllables dissimilate; e.g. [bebe] > [bepe]
Second stage
[g] > [j] before front vowels
Word-medial stops geminate before /r/
Non-geminate /b d g f s/ > [v ð ɣ v z] postvocalically
/g/ > [ɣ] word-initially
Intervocalic /x/ > [h]
All consonants devoice word-finally
/k/ > [ts] before front vowels
I was going to make coda [ɣ] > [ː] be a change but then I realized the phonotactics were too simple
Examples:
/kilisa/ > [tsiliza]
/ungro/ > [uŋggro]
/dadum/ > [daðum̥]
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
A phonology i made for an algonquian inspired language.
/m mʷ n nʷ n̪ ɲ ɲʷ/ m m̌ n ň nn y y̌
/p t t̪ c k q/ p t tt k c q
/s/ s
/θ ɹ x/ th r x
/ʟ̠/ l
/i y u/ ı ı̌ u
/ɘ ɵ/ ǔ ǒ
/ɛ œ/ e o
Syllable structure is (C1)(C3)V(C2)
Any consonant besides n and θ can appear in the C1 position.
Only θ can appear in the C3 position
Any vowel can appear in the V position, but if two vowels are lined up the second vowel has to be a front vowel.
Only t k ɹ x ʟ̠ and n can appear in the C2 position.
/m mʷ n nʷ n̪ ɲ ɲʷ/ m m̌ n ň nn y y̌
/p t t̪ c k q/ p t tt k c q
/s/ s
/θ ɹ x/ th r x
/ʟ̠/ l
/i y u/ ı ı̌ u
/ɘ ɵ/ ǔ ǒ
/ɛ œ/ e o
Syllable structure is (C1)(C3)V(C2)
Any consonant besides n and θ can appear in the C1 position.
Only θ can appear in the C3 position
Any vowel can appear in the V position, but if two vowels are lined up the second vowel has to be a front vowel.
Only t k ɹ x ʟ̠ and n can appear in the C2 position.
Last edited by Parlox on 26 Aug 2017 02:40, edited 1 time in total.
Gândölansch (Gondolan) • Feongkrwe (Feongrkean) • Tamhanddön (Tamanthon) • Θανηλοξαμαψⱶ (Thanelotic) • Yônjcerth (Yaponese) • Ba̧supan (Basupan) • Mùthoķán (Mothaucian)
- DesEsseintes
- mongolian
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: 31 Mar 2013 13:16
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
What's the syllable structure? I hope it's not CVC cos then it would seem θ is disallowed everywhere.Parlox wrote:A phonology i made for an algonquian inspired language.
/m mʷ n nʷ n̪ ɲ ɲʷ/ m m̌ n ň nn y y̌
/p t t̪ c k q/ p t tt k c q
/s/ s
/θ ɹ x/ th r x
/ʟ̠/ l
/i y u/ ı ı̌ u
/ɘ ɵ/ ǔ ǒ
/ɛ œ/ e o
Any consonant besides n and θ can appear in the C1 position.
Any vowel can appear in the V position, but if two vowels are lined up the second vowel has to be a front vowel.
Only t k ɹ x ʟ̠ and n can appear in the C2 position.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I thought i posted the syllable structure, it is (C)(C)V(C). I fixed the postDesEsseintes wrote:What's the syllable structure? I hope it's not CVC cos then it would seem θ is disallowed everywhere.Parlox wrote:A phonology i made for an algonquian inspired language.
/m mʷ n nʷ n̪ ɲ ɲʷ/ m m̌ n ň nn y y̌
/p t t̪ c k q/ p t tt k c q
/s/ s
/θ ɹ x/ th r x
/ʟ̠/ l
/i y u/ ı ı̌ u
/ɘ ɵ/ ǔ ǒ
/ɛ œ/ e o
Any consonant besides n and θ can appear in the C1 position.
Any vowel can appear in the V position, but if two vowels are lined up the second vowel has to be a front vowel.
Only t k ɹ x ʟ̠ and n can appear in the C2 position.
Gândölansch (Gondolan) • Feongkrwe (Feongrkean) • Tamhanddön (Tamanthon) • Θανηλοξαμαψⱶ (Thanelotic) • Yônjcerth (Yaponese) • Ba̧supan (Basupan) • Mùthoķán (Mothaucian)
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6352
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
@cedh:
Is the "correction" below, actually correct?
BTW#1: @everyone: Does Spanish have the "liquid dissimilation" (or whatever to call it) rule I asked about in my first question?
thus "peligro" or "periglo" but not "peliglo" nor "perigro"?
and thus "peligrino" or "pilgrim" but not "peregrine" nor "peregrino"?
BTW#2: @everyone: Does Polish have the syllable structure I asked about in my second question?
That is, onset-clusters allowed only in word-initial syllables, and coda-clusters allowed only in word-final syllables?
Is the "correction" below, actually correct?
(I suppose anyone who knows the answer could post it!)cedh wrote:Yes again. (Many languages allow syllable-initialeldin raigmore wrote:2. Can a language naturalistically and/or realistically have different syllable structures depending where in the word syllables come?internalclusters only word-initially, and many languages allow coda clustersconsonantsonly word-finally. I don't know of any specific language that allows coda clusters only word-finally, but I'm fairly sure there are a few such languages out there.)
BTW#1: @everyone: Does Spanish have the "liquid dissimilation" (or whatever to call it) rule I asked about in my first question?
thus "peligro" or "periglo" but not "peliglo" nor "perigro"?
and thus "peligrino" or "pilgrim" but not "peregrine" nor "peregrino"?
BTW#2: @everyone: Does Polish have the syllable structure I asked about in my second question?
That is, onset-clusters allowed only in word-initial syllables, and coda-clusters allowed only in word-final syllables?
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I've nae been able to post anything for a while (due to my Higher exams and such) but here's one I've come up with
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d ɡ/
/ɓ̰ ɗ̰/
/t͡s d͡z ɗ͡z̰/
/s z h/
/w l/
/i e ɑ u/
Allophony
/s z/ are before a high vowel, [θ ð] elsewhere
/p b/ become [ɸ β] before or after another obstruent; they geminate if there are two of them — a /pb/ becomes [ββ] and /bp/ becomes [ɸɸ]
Vowels become nasal before a nasal consonant
Vowels after an implosive become creaky-voiced
/w/ becomes [ʋ̰] before or after an implosive
Any advice to make this more realistic would be greatly appreciated!
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d ɡ/
/ɓ̰ ɗ̰/
/t͡s d͡z ɗ͡z̰/
/s z h/
/w l/
/i e ɑ u/
Allophony
/s z/ are
/p b/ become [ɸ β] before or after another obstruent; they geminate if there are two of them — a /pb/ becomes [ββ] and /bp/ becomes [ɸɸ]
Vowels become nasal before a nasal consonant
Vowels after an implosive become creaky-voiced
/w/ becomes [ʋ̰] before or after an implosive
Any advice to make this more realistic would be greatly appreciated!
What can I say? I like making stuff up.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Jampot911 wrote:I've nae been able to post anything for a while (due to my Higher exams and such) but here's one I've come up with
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d ɡ/
/ɓ̰ ɗ̰/
/t͡s d͡z ɗ͡z̰/
/s z h/
/w l/
/i e ɑ u/
Allophony
/s z/ arebefore a high vowel, [θ ð] elsewhere
/p b/ become [ɸ β] before or after another obstruent; they geminate if there are two of them — a /pb/ becomes [ββ] and /bp/ becomes [ɸɸ]
Vowels become nasal before a nasal consonant
Vowels after an implosive become creaky-voiced
/w/ becomes [ʋ̰] before or after an implosive
Any advice to make this more realistic would be greatly appreciated!
Ooh! I like it. You don't see many African-Inspired conlangs. Everything looks pretty naturalistic, the only suggestion I might have is to change the geminated fricatives to geminated stops, since they tend to be unstable, but I'm not completely sure on that.
[hr][/hr]
A language family I've been thinking of developing. Inspiration comes from various languages with small inventories, from Arapaho to Pirahã to various Oceanic languages to some Papuan languages.
Proto Vaja
/p t tʃ k q/
/v~w ð ʒ~j ɣ ʁ/
/m n/
/i iː e eː a aː o oː u uː/
/˥ ˨/
The syllable structure is (s)(C)(D)V(:)(V)(C), where D stands for any voiced continuant.
Baa:
/b t k ʔ/
/ɸ s h/
/m n~l/
/w j/
/i iː ɪ ɪː e eː ɛ ɛː a aː ɔ ɔː o oː ʊ ʊː u uː/
/ĩ ĩː ɛ̃ ɛ̃ː ɔ̃ ɔ̃ː ũ ũː/
/˥ ˨ ˧˥ ˥˩ ˥˦ ˥˨˦/
Some Yoruba influences in the phonology here. The phonemes /m/ and /b/ remain unmerged, but merge in some dialects. There is also harmony between the tense and lax vowels, with /a/ being neutral.
Unnamed 1:
The following three languages are more closely related than the first, but are still rather independent.
/p t tʷ~tʙ̥ k kʷ ʔ/
/s sʷ x~h xʷ~ʍ/
/m~nʷ n/
/lʷ~ɫ ɾ ɰ w/
/a aː e i iː o u uː ə/
/˥ ˨ ˨˥ ˦˩/
Unnamed 2:
/p t k kʋ/
/b~β̞ d~ð̞ g~ɰ gʋ~ʋ/
/h/
/m n/
/i iː e eː ɑ ɑː o oː ɨ~ɯ~ɣ̩ ʋ̩ ð̩ β̩ m̩ n̩/
/˥ ˩ ˧/
Unnamed 3:
/t~k ts~s tɕ~j tɬ kʷ ʔ/
/h/
/v~w n~l/
/i e ɛ a ə ɔ o u/
/ɛ̃ ə̃ ɑ̃ ɔ̃/
/˥ ˧ ˨˩ ˦˨ ˩˥/
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Osia wrote:Jampot911 wrote:I've nae been able to post anything for a while (due to my Higher exams and such) but here's one I've come up with
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d ɡ/
/ɓ̰ ɗ̰/
/t͡s d͡z ɗ͡z̰/
/s z h/
/w l/
/i e ɑ u/
Allophony
/s z/ arebefore a high vowel, [θ ð] elsewhere
/p b/ become [ɸ β] before or after another obstruent; they geminate if there are two of them — a /pb/ becomes [ββ] and /bp/ becomes [ɸɸ]
Vowels become nasal before a nasal consonant
Vowels after an implosive become creaky-voiced
/w/ becomes [ʋ̰] before or after an implosive
Any advice to make this more realistic would be greatly appreciated!
Ooh! I like it. You don't see many African-Inspired conlangs. Everything looks pretty naturalistic, the only suggestion I might have is to change the geminated fricatives to geminated stops, since they tend to be unstable, but I'm not completely sure on that.
[hr][/hr]
A language family I've been thinking of developing. Inspiration comes from various languages with small inventories, from Arapaho to Pirahã to various Oceanic languages to some Papuan languages.
Proto Vaja
/p t tʃ k q/
/v~w ð ʒ~j ɣ ʁ/
/m n/
/i iː e eː a aː o oː u uː/
/˥ ˨/
The syllable structure is (s)(C)(D)V(:)(V)(C), where D stands for any voiced continuant.
Baa:
/b t k ʔ/
/ɸ s h/
/m n~l/
/w j/
/i iː ɪ ɪː e eː ɛ ɛː a aː ɔ ɔː o oː ʊ ʊː u uː/
/ĩ ĩː ɛ̃ ɛ̃ː ɔ̃ ɔ̃ː ũ ũː/
/˥ ˨ ˧˥ ˥˩ ˥˦ ˥˨˦/
Some Yoruba influences in the phonology here. The phonemes /m/ and /b/ remain unmerged, but merge in some dialects. There is also harmony between the tense and lax vowels, with /a/ being neutral.
Unnamed 1:
The following three languages are more closely related than the first, but are still rather independent.
/p t tʷ~tʙ̥ k kʷ ʔ/
/s sʷ x~h xʷ~ʍ/
/m~nʷ n/
/lʷ~ɫ ɾ ɰ w/
/a aː e i iː o u uː ə/
/˥ ˨ ˨˥ ˦˩/
Unnamed 2:
/p t k kʋ/
/b~β̞ d~ð̞ g~ɰ gʋ~ʋ/
/h/
/m n/
/i iː e eː ɑ ɑː o oː ɨ~ɯ~ɣ̩ ʋ̩ ð̩ β̩ m̩ n̩/
/˥ ˩ ˧/
Unnamed 3:
/t~k ts~s tɕ~j tɬ kʷ ʔ/
/h/
/v~w n~l/
/i e ɛ a ə ɔ o u/
/ɛ̃ ə̃ ɑ̃ ɔ̃/
/˥ ˧ ˨˩ ˦˨ ˩˥/
Ah, cheers mate, the change to geminated stops makes more sense now that I think about it. Plus they sound a bit better in my opinion!
Also, I must say I love "Unnamed 1" — all those labialised coronals sound so cool. And there's a bilabial trilled affricate, which'll always win you points in my book.
What can I say? I like making stuff up.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
p t tʲ k
f θ θʲ x ʍ
s sʲ ʃ
m n nʲ ŋ
bm dn dnʲ gŋ
l r
dl dr
j w
gʷw
f θ θʲ x ʍ
s sʲ ʃ
m n nʲ ŋ
bm dn dnʲ gŋ
l r
dl dr
j w
gʷw
My meta-thread: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5760
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
A phonology I thought up after reading a bit on the Ryukyuan languages.
/t' tɕ' k' ʔ/
/p t tɕ k/
/ɸ s ɕ x~h/
/ɸː sː ɕː xː/
/m n/
/mː nː/
/β̞ z̞ j ɣ̞/
/bː dː dʑː gː/
/a aː i iː ɨ ɨː ɨs ɨsː u uː/
CN(C)
Notes:
The vowel ɨs is a sulcalized vowel, that is it has a grooved or silibant like air passage way.
All consonants except stops and ejectives can occur syllabic, where the syllabic versions of /β̞ z̞ j ɣ̞/ are /u ɨs i ɨ/.
The ejectives are derived from geminate stops, where /p'/ > /k'/ > /ʔ/.
In some dialects the ejective consonants merge with the plain stops, producing a low tone on the following vowel.
/t' tɕ' k' ʔ/
/p t tɕ k/
/ɸ s ɕ x~h/
/ɸː sː ɕː xː/
/m n/
/mː nː/
/β̞ z̞ j ɣ̞/
/bː dː dʑː gː/
/a aː i iː ɨ ɨː ɨs ɨsː u uː/
CN(C)
Notes:
The vowel ɨs is a sulcalized vowel, that is it has a grooved or silibant like air passage way.
All consonants except stops and ejectives can occur syllabic, where the syllabic versions of /β̞ z̞ j ɣ̞/ are /u ɨs i ɨ/.
The ejectives are derived from geminate stops, where /p'/ > /k'/ > /ʔ/.
In some dialects the ejective consonants merge with the plain stops, producing a low tone on the following vowel.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
A new phoneme inventory and orthography heavily inspired by macedonian, i haven't figured out how the syllables will work yet.
/m n n̪/ m n ň
/p b t̪ d̪ c ɟ k g/ p b t d y y̌ k g
/t̪͡θ d̪͡ð t̪͡s d̪͡z̪ t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/ th dh ts dz č ǰ
/s z ʃ ʒ/ s z š ž
/f v ɹ j x/ f v r c h
/ɬ ɬ̪/ l ľ
/i u/ ı u
/ɘ o/ ǒ o
/ɛ ʌ/ e ǔ
/a/ a
/m n n̪/ m n ň
/p b t̪ d̪ c ɟ k g/ p b t d y y̌ k g
/t̪͡θ d̪͡ð t̪͡s d̪͡z̪ t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/ th dh ts dz č ǰ
/s z ʃ ʒ/ s z š ž
/f v ɹ j x/ f v r c h
/ɬ ɬ̪/ l ľ
/i u/ ı u
/ɘ o/ ǒ o
/ɛ ʌ/ e ǔ
/a/ a
Gândölansch (Gondolan) • Feongkrwe (Feongrkean) • Tamhanddön (Tamanthon) • Θανηλοξαμαψⱶ (Thanelotic) • Yônjcerth (Yaponese) • Ba̧supan (Basupan) • Mùthoķán (Mothaucian)
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I love this so much! Can you provide more word examples? What kind of assimilation occurs if you have a word ending in a voiced stop before a voiceless one in the next syllable. Does the /k/ to /ts/ come from somewhere? It seems odd.Porphyrogenitos wrote:A kinda minimalistic thing inspired by Old Saxon and West Germanic more generally:
Phonemes/Pre-Stage
/m n ŋ/
/p t k/
/b d g/
/f s x/
/r/
/a e i o u/
Syllable structure: (C)(r)V(N)
Allophony/sound changes
First stage
All voiceless stops are aspirated; /r/ after a voiceless stop becomes voiceless.
Nasals assimilate to the place of the following consonant.
Identical voiced stops in successive syllables dissimilate; e.g. [bebe] > [bepe]
Second stage
[g] > [j] before front vowels
Word-medial stops geminate before /r/
Non-geminate /b d g f s/ > [v ð ɣ v z] postvocalically
/g/ > [ɣ] word-initially
Intervocalic /x/ > [h]
All consonants devoice word-finally
/k/ > [ts] before front vowels
I was going to make coda [ɣ] > [ː] be a change but then I realized the phonotactics were too simple
Examples:
/kilisa/ > [tsiliza]
/ungro/ > [uŋggro]
/dadum/ > [daðum̥]
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I think those changes from Latin were pretty inconsistent if not totally sporadic (peregrinus > peregrino, arbor > árbol), and peligro is an example of metathesis from periculum. (Although peregrino may be a cultismo; I don't have a good etymological dictionary.) In any case, the rule doesn't seem to be productive.eldin raigmore wrote:BTW#1: @everyone: Does Spanish have the "liquid dissimilation" (or whatever to call it) rule I asked about in my first question?
thus "peligro" or "periglo" but not "peliglo" nor "perigro"?
and thus "peligrino" or "pilgrim" but not "peregrine" nor "peregrino"?
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
This is a relative of Fuheko and Karèwaho:
/p p: b t t: d ts t:s dz k k: g/ <p pp b t tt d c tc z̟ tch k kk g>
/ θ ð s z h/ <th dh s z h>
/m m: n n: / <m mm n nn >
/j ʋ/ <y v>
/l/ <l>
/i y u ɯ/ <i ü u ǔ>
/e ø ɘ o/ <e ö ě o>
/œ ɔ/ <ȍ ò>
/æ ɑ/ <ä a>
It has Front and Rounding harmony, with /ɘ/ being the unrounded back vowel for the mid-vowels, and /œ ɔ/ being the rounded version of /æ ɑ/.
/p p: b t t: d ts t:s dz k k: g/ <p pp b t tt d c tc z̟ tch k kk g>
/ θ ð s z h/ <th dh s z h>
/m m: n n: / <m mm n nn >
/j ʋ/ <y v>
/l/ <l>
/i y u ɯ/ <i ü u ǔ>
/e ø ɘ o/ <e ö ě o>
/œ ɔ/ <ȍ ò>
/æ ɑ/ <ä a>
It has Front and Rounding harmony, with /ɘ/ being the unrounded back vowel for the mid-vowels, and /œ ɔ/ being the rounded version of /æ ɑ/.
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
-JRR Tolkien
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Finally decided on a rough sketch of Proto-Archipelagic. But it is a night-fucking-mare to orthographize. It's got touches of Kabyle and Tlingit and I'm sure subconsciously many others.
Consonants
Nasals /m n ɲ~ŋ/
Voiceless Stops /p t̪ t͡s t͡ɬ t͡ʃ k kʷ q qʷ ʔ/
Voiced Stops /b d̪ d͡z d͡ɮ d͡ʒ g gʷ/
Ejectives /pʼ t̪ʼ t͡sʼ t͡ɬʼ t͡ʃʼ kʼ kʷʼ qʼ qʷʼ/
Voiceless Fricatives /s ɬ ʃ ç~x çʷ~xʷ χ χʷ ħ h/
Voiced Fricatives /v ɮ ʝ~ɣ ʝʷ~ɣʷ ʕ/
Ejective Fricatives /sʼ ɬʼ ʃʼ xʼ xʷʼ χʼ χʷʼ/
Voiceless Sonorants /r̥ ʍ/
Voiced Sonorants /r w/
Vowels
Short Vowels /i e̞ a o̞/
Long Vowels /iː eː aː oː/
Diphthongs /ai aːi/
Notes
I have been thinking about how I am going to justify the pharyngeals, but since this will be a Proto-Language anyway, I don't need a ton of rationalization. But even in proto-languages I do like a tad bit of naturalistic diachronic work. Perhaps I can say that uvulars shifted to pharyngeal position and then were redeveloped into the language via contact languages or just through phonological processes.
Oh, and a question to anyone who is willing to answer. This is just a question of subjective preference but - what would be your thoughts on having /ç x χ ħ h/? This seems a bit much for even me, but there are cases where I can imagine having minimal pairs of words between /ç/ and/ x/, /x/ and /χ/, /χ/ and /ħ/, and /ħ/ and /h/ and I like that idea. But, I don't want to keep pushing the boundaries of phonemic maximalism.
My thought is maintaining either allophony between palatal and velar fricatives or velar and uvular fricatives. If you have an opinion, I'd love to hear it. Thank you.
Consonants
Nasals /m n ɲ~ŋ/
Voiceless Stops /p t̪ t͡s t͡ɬ t͡ʃ k kʷ q qʷ ʔ/
Voiced Stops /b d̪ d͡z d͡ɮ d͡ʒ g gʷ/
Ejectives /pʼ t̪ʼ t͡sʼ t͡ɬʼ t͡ʃʼ kʼ kʷʼ qʼ qʷʼ/
Voiceless Fricatives /s ɬ ʃ ç~x çʷ~xʷ χ χʷ ħ h/
Voiced Fricatives /v ɮ ʝ~ɣ ʝʷ~ɣʷ ʕ/
Ejective Fricatives /sʼ ɬʼ ʃʼ xʼ xʷʼ χʼ χʷʼ/
Voiceless Sonorants /r̥ ʍ/
Voiced Sonorants /r w/
Vowels
Short Vowels /i e̞ a o̞/
Long Vowels /iː eː aː oː/
Diphthongs /ai aːi/
Notes
- I did not include geminate consonants in the list above but they are prevalent in Proto-Archipelagic. Geminates occur mostly in medial/intervocallic position. A small number of (mostly resononant) sounds can occur in non-medial position as geminates as well, namely /mː nː sː ɬː wː/ occur at onset and /r̥ː rː/ can occur at coda/final position albeit incredibly rare and dialectal. More common then final codas are syllabic trills - /r̥ː rː/ can form syllable nuclei.
I am still unsure if the whole phonemic inventory will be able to be geminated. I am leaning against that. I may stick to a resononant-only series of geminates, but I need to work that out a bit more. I may make it so only coronal consonants can form geminates. Hmm... - Some of the above sounds are under-defined for their place of articulation.
- For instance /ɲ~ŋ/ can be considered merely a "dorsal nasal" where it's phonic environment determines its realization. Namely, the dorsal nasal is realized as palatal /ɲ/ in onset position, and velar in coda /ŋ/. This can change if the final /ŋ/ abuts a following syllable which begins with a palatal/post-alveolar consonant.
- The sounds /ç~x çʷ~xʷ/ are underdefined for their POA as well. The split in their usage is predicated on their proximity to front vowels which in PArch is /i e/. I am toying with shifting them from palatal-velar to perhaps velar-uvular and dropping the phonemic distinction between velar and uvular fricatives. But if I do that, I am unsure if I would keep the palatal fricatives or not, and they are growing on me. I like them a bit.
- Generally the syllable structure is (C)(C)V(:)(C) but there are restrictions (listed next). It should be noted that CV, CVC, and VC syllable types are more common than CCVC syllables (and I'm going to say that perhaps CCV doesn't exist at all, at least in this stage of the language)
- Consonant clusters occur only in roots and are restricted to CC- combinations at onset. The following are the allowable clusters: /sk skʷ skʼ skʷʼ sq sqʷ sqʼ sqʷʼ ɬk ɬkʷ ɬkʼ ɬkʷʼ ɬq ɬqʷ ɬqʼ ɬqʷʼ sχ sχʷ/ (those "sx" looking combinations are actually alveolar + uvular, but I suppose they could be allophonically velar too.
- Ejectives can occur at both onset and coda and also maintain their labialization distinction. (I'm looking at you Tlingit, you beautiful monstrosity)
- As for the vowels, the system is lifted off Navajo, save for the nasal vowels and tone, so maybe I just stole it from Dothraki? I don't know, I just know that I love /i e a o/. It is truly /i e a o/ as well even in stressed, long syllables /oː/ doesn't get any "tenser" and doesn't approach /u/ at all.
I have been thinking about how I am going to justify the pharyngeals, but since this will be a Proto-Language anyway, I don't need a ton of rationalization. But even in proto-languages I do like a tad bit of naturalistic diachronic work. Perhaps I can say that uvulars shifted to pharyngeal position and then were redeveloped into the language via contact languages or just through phonological processes.
Oh, and a question to anyone who is willing to answer. This is just a question of subjective preference but - what would be your thoughts on having /ç x χ ħ h/? This seems a bit much for even me, but there are cases where I can imagine having minimal pairs of words between /ç/ and/ x/, /x/ and /χ/, /χ/ and /ħ/, and /ħ/ and /h/ and I like that idea. But, I don't want to keep pushing the boundaries of phonemic maximalism.
My thought is maintaining either allophony between palatal and velar fricatives or velar and uvular fricatives. If you have an opinion, I'd love to hear it. Thank you.
-
- sinic
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 21 Jul 2012 08:01
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Thanks! And you can pretty much just come up with your own examples, if you wish, by following the syllable rules I described - it's just an idea, so none of the words actually mean anything. But some more example with phoneme combinations I hadn't used yet include:Nachtuil wrote:
I love this so much! Can you provide more word examples?
/maxalas/ [mahalaz]
/gog/ [gox]
/adral/ [addral̥]
/kinib/ [tsinif]
/aba/ [ava]
Oh, oops. I forgot I'd need to deal with this. In fact, I thought I'd eliminated it by having a simpler syllable structure, but yeah, word boundaries. I might as well make the syllable structure full CVC then. So I guess not too much happens - postvocalic fricatives and voiced stops are still lenited, so /abpa/ and /aska/ will still be [avpa] and [azka]. Actually, let's say a following voiceless stop blocks fricatives (but not voiced stops) from leniting. So /aska/ will be [aska]. The change of pre-consonantal [ɣ] to [ː] will go ahead, so /agma/ will be [aːma]. Basically, all the allophones ar eripe for phonemicization - all you need to do is delete the final vowels, and the difference between /aba/ [ava] and /ab/ [af] will no longer predictable - /av/ vs. /af/. And so on.Nachtuil wrote:
What kind of assimilation occurs if you have a word ending in a voiced stop before a voiceless one in the next syllable. Does the /k/ to /ts/ come from somewhere?
It's the result of palatalization; it's actually quite typical - e.g. all of Gallo-Iberian Romance went through a /k/ > /ts/ shift before front vowels; Latin civitas became Spanish ciudad, French cité, Portuguese cidade, etc., all of which were once pronounced with an initial /ts/ before shifting to their modern pronunciations.Nachtuil wrote:Does the /k/ to /ts/ come from somewhere? It seems odd.
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
Well you could do this:wintiver wrote:Finally decided on a rough sketch of Proto-Archipelagic. But it is a night-fucking-mare to orthographize. It's got touches of Kabyle and Tlingit and I'm sure subconsciously many others.
Consonants
Nasals /m n ɲ~ŋ/
Voiceless Stops /p t̪ t͡s t͡ɬ t͡ʃ k kʷ q qʷ ʔ/
Voiced Stops /b d̪ d͡z d͡ɮ d͡ʒ g gʷ/
Ejectives /pʼ t̪ʼ t͡sʼ t͡ɬʼ t͡ʃʼ kʼ kʷʼ qʼ qʷʼ/
Voiceless Fricatives /s ɬ ʃ ç~x çʷ~xʷ χ χʷ ħ h/
Voiced Fricatives /v ɮ ʝ~ɣ ʝʷ~ɣʷ ʕ/
Ejective Fricatives /sʼ ɬʼ ʃʼ xʼ xʷʼ χʼ χʷʼ/
Voiceless Sonorants /r̥ ʍ/
Voiced Sonorants /r w/
Vowels
Short Vowels /i e̞ a o̞/
Long Vowels /iː eː aː oː/
Diphthongs /ai aːi/
Notes
- I did not include geminate consonants in the list above but they are prevalent in Proto-Archipelagic. Geminates occur mostly in medial/intervocallic position. A small number of (mostly resononant) sounds can occur in non-medial position as geminates as well, namely /mː nː sː ɬː wː/ occur at onset and /r̥ː rː/ can occur at coda/final position albeit incredibly rare and dialectal. More common then final codas are syllabic trills - /r̥ː rː/ can form syllable nuclei.
I am still unsure if the whole phonemic inventory will be able to be geminated. I am leaning against that. I may stick to a resononant-only series of geminates, but I need to work that out a bit more. I may make it so only coronal consonants can form geminates. Hmm...- Some of the above sounds are under-defined for their place of articulation.
- For instance /ɲ~ŋ/ can be considered merely a "dorsal nasal" where it's phonic environment determines its realization. Namely, the dorsal nasal is realized as palatal /ɲ/ in onset position, and velar in coda /ŋ/. This can change if the final /ŋ/ abuts a following syllable which begins with a palatal/post-alveolar consonant.
- The sounds /ç~x çʷ~xʷ/ are underdefined for their POA as well. The split in their usage is predicated on their proximity to front vowels which in PArch is /i e/. I am toying with shifting them from palatal-velar to perhaps velar-uvular and dropping the phonemic distinction between velar and uvular fricatives. But if I do that, I am unsure if I would keep the palatal fricatives or not, and they are growing on me. I like them a bit.
- Generally the syllable structure is (C)(C)V(:)(C) but there are restrictions (listed next). It should be noted that CV, CVC, and VC syllable types are more common than CCVC syllables (and I'm going to say that perhaps CCV doesn't exist at all, at least in this stage of the language)
- Consonant clusters occur only in roots and are restricted to CC- combinations at onset. The following are the allowable clusters: /sk skʷ skʼ skʷʼ sq sqʷ sqʼ sqʷʼ ɬk ɬkʷ ɬkʼ ɬkʷʼ ɬq ɬqʷ ɬqʼ ɬqʷʼ sχ sχʷ/ (those "sx" looking combinations are actually alveolar + uvular, but I suppose they could be allophonically velar too.
- Ejectives can occur at both onset and coda and also maintain their labialization distinction. (I'm looking at you Tlingit, you beautiful monstrosity)
- As for the vowels, the system is lifted off Navajo, save for the nasal vowels and tone, so maybe I just stole it from Dothraki? I don't know, I just know that I love /i e a o/. It is truly /i e a o/ as well even in stressed, long syllables /oː/ doesn't get any "tenser" and doesn't approach /u/ at all.
I have been thinking about how I am going to justify the pharyngeals, but since this will be a Proto-Language anyway, I don't need a ton of rationalization. But even in proto-languages I do like a tad bit of naturalistic diachronic work. Perhaps I can say that uvulars shifted to pharyngeal position and then were redeveloped into the language via contact languages or just through phonological processes.
Oh, and a question to anyone who is willing to answer. This is just a question of subjective preference but - what would be your thoughts on having /ç x χ ħ h/? This seems a bit much for even me, but there are cases where I can imagine having minimal pairs of words between /ç/ and/ x/, /x/ and /χ/, /χ/ and /ħ/, and /ħ/ and /h/ and I like that idea. But, I don't want to keep pushing the boundaries of phonemic maximalism.
My thought is maintaining either allophony between palatal and velar fricatives or velar and uvular fricatives. If you have an opinion, I'd love to hear it. Thank you.
Nasals /m n ɲ~ŋ/ m - n - ń
Voiceless Stops /p t̪ t͡s t͡ɬ t͡ʃ k kʷ q qʷ ʔ/ p - t - c - tl - tś - k - ku - q - qu
Voiced Stops /b d̪ d͡z d͡ɮ d͡ʒ g gʷ/ b - d - v - dź - x - g - gu
Ejectives /pʼ t̪ʼ t͡sʼ t͡ɬʼ t͡ʃʼ kʼ kʷʼ qʼ qʷʼ/ pp - tt - cc - tll - ttś - kk - kku - qq - qqu
Voiceless Fricatives /s ɬ ʃ ç~x çʷ~xʷ χ χʷ ħ h/ s - l - ś - j - ju - y - yu - f - h
Voiced Fricatives /v ɮ ʝ~ɣ ʝʷ~ɣʷ ʕ/ w - ź - ğ - ğu - z
Ejective Fricatives /sʼ ɬʼ ʃʼ xʼ xʷʼ χʼ χʷʼ/ ss - ll - śs - jj - jju - yy - yyu
Voiceless Sonorants /r̥ ʍ/ hr - (add acute accent /ʍa/ > á)
Voiced Sonorants /r w/ r - (add grave accent /wa/ > à)
Short Vowels /i e̞ a o̞/ i - e - a - o
Long Vowels /iː eː aː oː/ ii - ee - aa - oo
Diphthongs /ai aːi/ ạ - aạ
Part of this is from my own conlang; the double consonants for ejectives.
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
On a different note both Enindhilangkwa and Proto-Algonquian require all words to be vowel-final and only permit single-consonants word-initially but permit word-internal codas.cedh wrote:Yes again. (Many languages allow syllable-internal clusters only word-initially, and many languages allow coda consonants only word-finally. I don't know of any specific language that allows coda clusters only word-finally, but I'm fairly sure there are a few such languages out there.)eldin raigmore wrote:2. Can a language naturalistically and/or realistically have different syllable structures depending where in the word syllables come?
For instance, is the following a reasonable syllable structure?
*** One-syllable words have the maximal skeleton (C)(C)V(C)(C)
*** First syllables of words with two or more syllables have the maximal skeleton (C)(C)V(C)
*** Last syllables of words with two or more syllables have the maximal skeleton (C)V(C)(C)
*** Medial (i.e. not first and not last) syllables of words with three or more syllables have the maximal skeleton (C)V(C)
- DesEsseintes
- mongolian
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: 31 Mar 2013 13:16
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
I like the idea of allophony between velars and palatals, because it's so widespread in NA languages. Blackfoot for instance has a palatal realisation of /k/ after front vowels which I think is neat. Alternatively, have pharyngeal frics instead of uvulars, since there is no contrast in the stops at those PoAs. That's only if you decide you want to merge some of those.wintiver wrote:Oh, and a question to anyone who is willing to answer. This is just a question of subjective preference but - what would be your thoughts on having /ç x χ ħ h/? This seems a bit much for even me, but there are cases where I can imagine having minimal pairs of words between /ç/ and/ x/, /x/ and /χ/, /χ/ and /ħ/, and /ħ/ and /h/ and I like that idea. But, I don't want to keep pushing the boundaries of phonemic maximalism.
- Frislander
- mayan
- Posts: 2088
- Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
- Location: The North
Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread
First time in far too long. This is yet another "Alt-North-America" phonology.
/t k ʔ/ <t k ‘>
/t͡s t͡ɬ/ <c ƛ>
/s ɬ h/ <s ł h>
/m n/ <m n>
/w l j/ <w l y>
/i a ã o/ <i a v o> in long and short.
Sylable structure is CV(C), where any consonant bar the nasals ad affricates may appear in the coda, with the exceptions that /j/ doesn't occur after /i/ and /w/ doesn't occur after /o/.
/t k ʔ/ <t k ‘>
/t͡s t͡ɬ/ <c ƛ>
/s ɬ h/ <s ł h>
/m n/ <m n>
/w l j/ <w l y>
/i a ã o/ <i a v o> in long and short.
Sylable structure is CV(C), where any consonant bar the nasals ad affricates may appear in the coda, with the exceptions that /j/ doesn't occur after /i/ and /w/ doesn't occur after /o/.