The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

Alright.

I like /ɯ/, so I'd like to keep that one.
User avatar
Ossicone
vice admin
vice admin
Posts: 2909
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 05:20
Location: I've heard it both ways.
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II

Post by Ossicone »

/i ɨ ɯ ɛ ɜ ɤ æ a ɑ/
<i í u e é o æ á a>

???

Can we swtich ɐ to a? It seems silly and a is easy to write.

EDIT: Or merge æ and a?


EDITEDIT:
/i ɨ ɯ ɛ ɜ ɤ æ~a ɑ/
<i í u e é o a á>
Last edited by Ossicone on 15 Apr 2011 03:22, edited 1 time in total.
Thakowsaizmu
runic
runic
Posts: 2518
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 18:57

Re: The Collablang Take II

Post by Thakowsaizmu »

Ossicone wrote: Can we swtich ɐ to a? It seems silly and a is easy to write.
We can always ditch /ɐ/
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II

Post by Ceresz »

Ossicone wrote: EDIT: Or merge æ and a?


EDITEDIT:
/i ɨ ɯ ɛ ɜ ɤ æ~a ɑ/
<i í u e é o a á>
Sounds good to me.
Thakowsaizmu
runic
runic
Posts: 2518
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 18:57

Re: The Collablang Take II

Post by Thakowsaizmu »

Ceresz wrote:
Ossicone wrote: EDIT: Or merge æ and a?


EDITEDIT:
/i ɨ ɯ ɛ ɜ ɤ æ~a ɑ/
<i í u e é o a á>
Sounds good to me.
<i y u e eo o ae a>
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

I'm fine with either.
User avatar
Ossicone
vice admin
vice admin
Posts: 2909
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 05:20
Location: I've heard it both ways.
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ossicone »

You have to choose!

I like <i í u e é o a á> better.
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

I don't want to choose :-o!

I like them both. But <i í u e é o a á> seems more effective to me.
User avatar
Ossicone
vice admin
vice admin
Posts: 2909
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 05:20
Location: I've heard it both ways.
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ossicone »

You must choose! >:D
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

Didn't I just do that, pretty much?
User avatar
Ossicone
vice admin
vice admin
Posts: 2909
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 05:20
Location: I've heard it both ways.
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ossicone »

Yeah but I wanted to evil face.
Thakowsaizmu
runic
runic
Posts: 2518
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 18:57

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Thakowsaizmu »

Ceresz wrote:I don't want to choose :-o!

I like them both. But <i í u e é o a á> seems more effective to me.
I am seeing those as stresses. Maybe we should wait and have someone else propose and vote on the vowels?
User avatar
Ossicone
vice admin
vice admin
Posts: 2909
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 05:20
Location: I've heard it both ways.
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ossicone »

Probably for the best.
User avatar
Micamo
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5671
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 19:48
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Micamo »

I like Asania's version better. Accents are so damned annoying.
My pronouns are <xe> [ziː] / <xym> [zɪm] / <xys> [zɪz]

My shitty twitter
Thakowsaizmu
runic
runic
Posts: 2518
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 18:57

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Thakowsaizmu »

Micamo wrote:I like Asania's version better. Accents are so damned annoying.
Yeah, what she said...
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

I don't mind either.

I just hate the look of <jy> :P.
Thakowsaizmu
runic
runic
Posts: 2518
Joined: 13 Aug 2010 18:57

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Thakowsaizmu »

Ceresz wrote:I don't mind either.

I just hate the look of <jy> :P.
Then <jy> is just not an allowed combination. Problemme solved.
User avatar
Ceresz
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2237
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 02:14
Location: North
Contact:

Re: The Collablang Take II (Check first post oft)

Post by Ceresz »

I think it's just because I prefer <y> for /j/, but I don't mind.

Anyway, I like some of these structure ideas. Maybe we should start thinking about that soon?
Thakowsaizmu wrote:
roninbodhisattva wrote: How about words being mono- or di syllabic with an optional word-final coda: CV(CV)(C), with the coda's being limited to something similar the limit's you've placed, adding /r/.

This leaves us with a hypothetical inventory of:

/m m̥ n̥ n (p) v t k tθ s ɬ ʃ h j l r/

I've made the voiceless nasals phonemic because if we're doing one consonant codas and having them there, they need to be single phonemes. It's a little strange still, we might wanna fill in a gap or two.
I like the structure idea. I would want to add C(i,u)V(CV)(C)
Post Reply