Guess the Word in Future Englishes

[GamerGeek]

Sorry for the string of questions, but there's been a lack.

Oh, I didn't even know Creyeditor had given a word since there was no new post to trigger a notification!

[Creyeditor]

I'll give it a go
Just give me a few hours.

Edit: Here it is:
/ɸɛ̃̌.tɨ̃̀.mə̃̌/
[ɸœ̃̌.dɨ̃̀.mə̃̌]
In case its not readable: All vowels are nasalized, the first and last one have a rising tone, the other one has a low tone.
Also just a quick warning. I might not answer immediatly.

Is it composed of multiple morphemes?
Is it derived from a single word in Modern English (MdE)?
Is the bilabial fricative derived from MdE /f/?
Is the tone derived from loss of final consonants?

Sorry for the string of questions, but there's been a lack.

Yes, in Modern English it is.
Yes.
No.
Partially.

[GamerGeek]

Is the bilabial fricative derived from MdE /f/?

/p/?

[Creyeditor]

Not in this particular word

[spanick]

Does it perhaps derived from the cluster /sw/?

[zyma]

Does it perhaps derived from the cluster /sw/?

Or /b/?

[Creyeditor]

Does it perhaps derived from the cluster /sw/?

No

Or /b/?

Yes

[spanick]

Is the nasalization of every syllable due to the loss of a coda nasal in every syllable?

[GamerGeek]

Is the nasalization of every syllable due to the loss of a coda nasal in every syllable?

If not, does it apply to all vowels?

[Creyeditor]

Is the nasalization of every syllable due to the loss of a coda nasal in every syllable?

Yes

[GamerGeek]

In case its not readable:

This is why you use ogoneks

[spanick]

Were the onsets of the second and third syllables originally /d/ and /m/ respectively in Modern English?

[GamerGeek]

Were the onsets of the second and third syllables originally /d/ and /m/ respectively in Modern English?

If not, is the [d] an intervocalic /t/?

[qwed117]

If not, is the [d] an intervocalic /t/?

/ɸɛ̃̌.tɨ̃̀.mə̃̌/
[ɸœ̃̌.dɨ̃̀.mə̃̌]

[Creyeditor]

Were the onsets of the second and third syllables originally /d/ and /m/ respectively in Modern English?

The the onsets of the second and third syllables in the future word were originally /d/ and /m/

[GamerGeek]

If not, is the [d] an intervocalic /t/?

/ɸɛ̃̌.tɨ̃̀.mə̃̌/
[ɸœ̃̌.dɨ̃̀.mə̃̌]

-_-

[zyma]

To recap what we know about /ɸɛ̃̌.tɨ̃̀.mə̃̌/ [ɸœ̃̌.dɨ̃̀.mə̃̌]:

• In Modern English it was one word made up of multiple morphemes.
• The tones are partially derived from a loss of coda consonants.
• Each syllable has lost a coda nasal, resulting in nasalization.
• The three consonants were originally /b/, /d/, and /m/.

Is this correct, Creyeditor?

[Creyeditor]

This is correct. Here are some further hints:

• It is derived from a four syllable word in Modern English. The first syllable in MO has no nasal coda.
• The word has three non-nasal consonants in MO. The word-final consonant in MO is a /t/.

[zyma]

This is correct. Here are some further hints:

• It is derived from a four syllable word in Modern English. The first syllable in MO has no nasal coda.
• The word has three non-nasal consonants in MO. The word-final consonant in MO is a /t/.

Did the first syllable contain either a schwa or /h/ in Modern English? Was it a CV syllable?

So, its CV(C)bVNdVNmVNt?

Was the word made up of three morphemes in Modern English?

[Jackk]

Going off that pattern shimobaatar posted:

Is it abandonment?