(Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here [2010-2020]
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
This is just a quick idea that popped into my head, and I'm not even sure if I'm planning on using this idea, but I
was wondering if "voiceless harmony" is something that exists, or seems feasible. As in, a system similar to Guarani, except an entire syllable must be voiceless (with a voiceless vowel too) or voiced (with all voiced vowels and consonants). Thanks!
was wondering if "voiceless harmony" is something that exists, or seems feasible. As in, a system similar to Guarani, except an entire syllable must be voiceless (with a voiceless vowel too) or voiced (with all voiced vowels and consonants). Thanks!
What can I say? I like making stuff up.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Lofdǣdum sceal in mǣgþa gehƿǣre man geþeon.
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I can't think of any Natlang examples, but if palatal harmony can exist I don't see why not voicing harmony.
- WeepingElf
- greek
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
There is something like that reconstructed for PIE. Voiceless stops do not occur in roots together with breathy-voiced stops, a pattern that becomes a voicing harmony rule under the glottalic hypothesis (other phonemes than pulmonic stops have no voicing distinction, and are transparent). However, this holds only for roots; suffixes may be disharmonious (e.g. *bhrou-tom, the PIE antecedent of English bread). Well, there is an idea for something to pursue in an IE conlang!
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
My conlang pages
My conlang pages
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Does anybody know of a good free online paper on Proto-Indo-Iranian?
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
-JRR Tolkien
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I'm trying to see if the following table for Kovur division of "persons" or "personal space", makes sense, especially in terms of terminology:
Unlike in human languages, the Kovur rely on the division of the space around them into "near the speaker" and "far from the speaker", with different languages extending exactly where this boundary is to different points, either including or excluding the listener within the "space" of the speaker.
This division of space splits both nouns and verbs into two classes (marked in bold in the table), which take different markings (marked in non-bold italics in the table). Verbs can either take a subject which is nearer to the speaker, or further away, but is cannot take both. Similarly, a noun can either be possessed by someone nearer the speaker, or further away, but not by both (similar in a way to alienability in some human languages).
So, for example, in a language displaying a proximity division for verbs, a proximal verb will mark the speaker as the subject as proximate and the listener as the subject as obviative. Similarly, an "other" subject nearer to the speaker will be marked on a distal verb or proximate and an "other" subject further away will be marked as obviative, using the same affixes as for the speaker and listener.
In a language displaying an egophoricity (1) division for nouns, an egophoric noun possessed by the speaker will be marked as proximate. Similarly, a non-egophoric noun possessed by the listener will be marked as or proximate and a non-egophoric noun possessed by someone else will be marked as obviative, using the same proximate suffix in both instances.
What actions, states, objects and concepts fall into each class varies from language to language, but, for example, a "hand" is almost always a proximal or egophoric noun and "to give" almost always a proximal or egophoric verb, while "mountain" is almost always distal or non-egophoric noun and "to take" is almost always a distal or non-egophoric verb. So in a language displaying proximity, "hand-PROX" would almost definitely mean "my hand" not "his hand" and "take-DIST" will almost definitely mean "he over there takes".
Unlike in human languages, the Kovur rely on the division of the space around them into "near the speaker" and "far from the speaker", with different languages extending exactly where this boundary is to different points, either including or excluding the listener within the "space" of the speaker.
This division of space splits both nouns and verbs into two classes (marked in bold in the table), which take different markings (marked in non-bold italics in the table). Verbs can either take a subject which is nearer to the speaker, or further away, but is cannot take both. Similarly, a noun can either be possessed by someone nearer the speaker, or further away, but not by both (similar in a way to alienability in some human languages).
So, for example, in a language displaying a proximity division for verbs, a proximal verb will mark the speaker as the subject as proximate and the listener as the subject as obviative. Similarly, an "other" subject nearer to the speaker will be marked on a distal verb or proximate and an "other" subject further away will be marked as obviative, using the same affixes as for the speaker and listener.
In a language displaying an egophoricity (1) division for nouns, an egophoric noun possessed by the speaker will be marked as proximate. Similarly, a non-egophoric noun possessed by the listener will be marked as or proximate and a non-egophoric noun possessed by someone else will be marked as obviative, using the same proximate suffix in both instances.
What actions, states, objects and concepts fall into each class varies from language to language, but, for example, a "hand" is almost always a proximal or egophoric noun and "to give" almost always a proximal or egophoric verb, while "mountain" is almost always distal or non-egophoric noun and "to take" is almost always a distal or non-egophoric verb. So in a language displaying proximity, "hand-PROX" would almost definitely mean "my hand" not "his hand" and "take-DIST" will almost definitely mean "he over there takes".
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
What is your obviative obviating?
I think you might be using that term in a manner so different from any of its non-linguistic and natlinguistic uses that it amounts to straight-out misuse, rather than redefinition.
I could be wrong.
Could you look up the non linguistic meanings of “obviate”, and the origins of its linguistic use?
Then explain how/why you’re use of it here is similar?
Maybe then I’d understand.
Or, maybe you’d decide you should use some other term?
(The use you are putting it to here seems to fit “distal” much much better than “obviative”.)
(I see you are already using “distal”.
Maybe you want three terms; {proximal, medial, distal} or {proximal, distal, further distal} or {proximal, distal 1, distal 2} or something like that. )
I think you might be using that term in a manner so different from any of its non-linguistic and natlinguistic uses that it amounts to straight-out misuse, rather than redefinition.
I could be wrong.
Could you look up the non linguistic meanings of “obviate”, and the origins of its linguistic use?
Then explain how/why you’re use of it here is similar?
Maybe then I’d understand.
Or, maybe you’d decide you should use some other term?
(The use you are putting it to here seems to fit “distal” much much better than “obviative”.)
(I see you are already using “distal”.
Maybe you want three terms; {proximal, medial, distal} or {proximal, distal, further distal} or {proximal, distal 1, distal 2} or something like that. )
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Does a language with polypersonal agreement need to mark plurality in them to be naturalistic? Are there attested languages with polypersonal agreement that mark only person and not number?
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
(Short answers: 1) No, it doesn’t have to; 2) Yes, it is attested.)
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen examples of languages with polypersonal agreement in which, for instance,
the verbs agree with (maybe) the person and number of the subject and the person and gender of the object, but not the gender of the subject or not the number of the object.
In other words the set of features in which it agrees with the subject, may be different than the set of features in which it agrees with the object.
Sorry I can’t remember the exact example or the exact reference.
But The Truth Is Out There — somewhere!
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen examples of languages with polypersonal agreement in which, for instance,
the verbs agree with (maybe) the person and number of the subject and the person and gender of the object, but not the gender of the subject or not the number of the object.
In other words the set of features in which it agrees with the subject, may be different than the set of features in which it agrees with the object.
Sorry I can’t remember the exact example or the exact reference.
But The Truth Is Out There — somewhere!
Last edited by eldin raigmore on 12 Jul 2018 22:41, edited 2 times in total.
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Hmmm, good point. I'd forgotten where "obviative" actually came from.eldin raigmore wrote: ↑10 Jul 2018 13:48 What is your obviative obviating?
I think you might be using that term in a manner so different from any of its non-linguistic and natlinguistic uses that it amounts to straight-out misuse, rather than redefinition.
I could be wrong.
Could you look up the non linguistic meanings of “obviate”, and the origins of its linguistic use?
Then explain how/why you’re use of it here is similar?
Maybe then I’d understand.
Or, maybe you’d decide you should use some other term?
(The use you are putting it to here seems to fit “distal” much much better than “obviative”.)
(I see you are already using “distal”.
Maybe you want three terms; {proximal, medial, distal} or {proximal, distal, further distal} or {proximal, distal 1, distal 2} or something like that. )
I'm looking to use distinct terms, though, which is an issue, and no system uses more than a "close" vs. "far" distinctions in terms of marking (in the "proximity" distinction, for example, the speaker and the nearby "other" take the same markings on verbs and on possessed nouns). "Distal", "proximal", "egophoric" and "non-egophoric" refer to classes of verbs, and, by extension, classes of nouns, so I suppose I could re-use the terms "distal" and "proximal" to refer to the affixes they take, but ideally I'm trying to avoid that situation, using distinct terminology that relates to that "near" vs. "far" distinction. I guess basically, then, I'm looking for another pair of terms for "near" and "far".
I had originally used three terms, but it didn't convey the situation in Kovur languages properly. There is no "medial" or "more distal" place within the system. Nouns and verbs are marked for possessors and subjects which are either close to the speaker or far from the speaker, but cannot be marked for both.
For example "hand" is a proximal noun or an egophoric noun in most languages, so when it appears as "hand-PROX" and "hand-DIST" (which only appears in languages displaying proximity) it means "my hand" and "your hand". "House", on the other hand, is frequently a distal noun or a non-egophoric noun in most languages, so when it appears as "house-PROX" and "house-DIST" it means "someone's house" or "the house of someone far away" in proximity languages and "your house" and "someone's house" in egophoricity languages. To say "his hand" or "my house", you'd need to should that possession in some more complex way, but so far, for "house" and for "hand", the "PROX" and "DIST" affixes are the same, but differ in meaning depending on the class the noun or verb belongs to.
Something like this:
And then trying to find distinct terminology for the -PROX and -DIST marking.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Can breathy, creaky etc. vowels affect the preceding consonant in some way?
Native:
Learning: , , ,
Zhér·dûn a tonal Germanic conlang
old stuff: Цiски | Noattȯč | Tungōnis Vīdīnōs
Learning: , , ,
Zhér·dûn a tonal Germanic conlang
old stuff: Цiски | Noattȯč | Tungōnis Vīdīnōs
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5121
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Breathy voice can get associated with the preceding consonant, like it is in Hindi. Creaky voice is basically glottalization and can therefore migrate to some consonants.
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
- eldin raigmore
- korean
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
- Location: SouthEast Michigan
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
@Sangi39: So maybe what you’re obviating is using the term “distal” with two different meanings?
Or something.
OTOH you have “egophoricity 1” and “egophoricity 2”. I would think “distal 1” and “distal 2” would be even easier.
Some natlangs are traditionally described as having “genitive 1” and “genitive 2”, or “gerund 1” and “gerund 2”, or “infinitive 1” and “infinitive 2”, vel cetera.
HTH?
Or: make one pair “proximal vs distal” and the other “local vs remote” or “present vs absent” or “near vs far” or some such.
Your terms don’t have to be Greekish or Latinate or Sanskrit or German, or even Hebrew or Arabic or Russian or Georgian.
Or something.
OTOH you have “egophoricity 1” and “egophoricity 2”. I would think “distal 1” and “distal 2” would be even easier.
Some natlangs are traditionally described as having “genitive 1” and “genitive 2”, or “gerund 1” and “gerund 2”, or “infinitive 1” and “infinitive 2”, vel cetera.
HTH?
Or: make one pair “proximal vs distal” and the other “local vs remote” or “present vs absent” or “near vs far” or some such.
Your terms don’t have to be Greekish or Latinate or Sanskrit or German, or even Hebrew or Arabic or Russian or Georgian.
My minicity is http://gonabebig1day.myminicity.com/xml
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I was okay with "egophoricity (1)" and "egophoricity (2)" because they're more or less describing subsets of roughly the same noun/verb class system, while "distal (1)" and "distal (2)" would describe two different phenomena (a noun/verb class vs. marking).eldin raigmore wrote: ↑12 Jul 2018 22:33 @Sangi39: So maybe what you’re obviating is using the term “distal” with two different meanings?
Or something.
OTOH you have “egophoricity 1” and “egophoricity 2”. I would think “distal 1” and “distal 2” would be even easier.
Some natlangs are traditionally described as having “genitive 1” and “genitive 2”, or “gerund 1” and “gerund 2”, or “infinitive 1” and “infinitive 2”, vel cetera.
HTH?
Or: make one pair “proximal vs distal” and the other “local vs remote” or “present vs absent” or “near vs far” or some such.
Your terms don’t have to be Greekish or Latinate or Sanskrit or German, or even Hebrew or Arabic or Russian or Georgian.
But thank you so much, I hadn't considered "local" vs. "remote". Honestly, I'd completely forgotten the word "local" was even, well, a world
That leaves me with:
Which I'm pretty happy with I just need to go back and rework everything I've written here so far, incorporating the above table, while also rewriting what I was going to post before I tried to come up with that table
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
-
- sinic
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 27 Jan 2013 02:12
- Contact:
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
In a language with a five vowel system of /a e i o u/, what are some possible evolutions/monophthongizations of rising diphthongs? Please also include intermediate stages, if possible; if the intermediate stage begins with /j/, I could use it to decide if a previous consonant is palatalized. Thanks!
ai > ? (e ?)
ei > ? (i ?)
oi > ?
ui > ?
au > ? (o ?)
eu > ?
iu > ?
ou > ? (u ?)
ai > ? (e ?)
ei > ? (i ?)
oi > ?
ui > ?
au > ? (o ?)
eu > ?
iu > ?
ou > ? (u ?)
Visit my website for my blogs and information on my conlangs: http://grwilliams.net/ It's a work in progress!
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5121
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Here's my idea; the basic idea is that low + high become lax mid and mid + high become lax high vowels. Rounded vowels plus front vowels yield front rounded vowels.felipesnark wrote: ↑13 Jul 2018 14:39 In a language with a five vowel system of /a e i o u/, what are some possible evolutions/monophthongizations of rising diphthongs? Please also include intermediate stages, if possible; if the intermediate stage begins with /j/, I could use it to decide if a previous consonant is palatalized. Thanks!
ai > æɪ > ɛe > ɛː > ɛ
ei > ɪi > ɪː > ɪ
oi > oy > øy > øʏ > ʏː > ʏ
au > ɑ̝ʊ > ʌo > ɔː > ɛ
eu > ey > øy > øʏ > ʏː > ʏ
iu > ʲyu > ʲyː > ʲy
ou > oʊ > ʊː > ʊ
PS: Also, most of these are falling diphthongs,so I provide a set of rising ones with ideas below: Basically the same as above, plus labialization and palatalization
ia > ɪæ > ʲeɛ > ʲɛː > ʲɛ
ie > ie > ʲɪi > ʲɪː > ʲɪ
io > ʲyo > ʲyø > ʲʏø > ʲʏː > ʲʏ
ua > ʊɑ̝ > ʷoʌ > ʷɔː > ʷɔ
ue > ʷye > ʷyø > ʷʏø > ʷʏː > ʷʏ
uo > ʊo > ʷʊː > ʷʊ
ui > uy > ʷyː > ʷy
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
-
- sinic
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 27 Jan 2013 02:12
- Contact:
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Thanks for the ideas! I want the final vowel system of this conlang to be /a e i o u/, so I would probably tense and un-round the vowels you have suggested here. Another thing I’m considering is that once the vowels get to the long monophthong stage you show above, some could break into new diphthongs. Of course, I would need to know some possibilities for vowel breaking, haha.Creyeditor wrote: ↑13 Jul 2018 22:52Here's my idea; the basic idea is that low + high become lax mid and mid + high become lax high vowels. Rounded vowels plus front vowels yield front rounded vowels.felipesnark wrote: ↑13 Jul 2018 14:39 In a language with a five vowel system of /a e i o u/, what are some possible evolutions/monophthongizations of rising diphthongs? Please also include intermediate stages, if possible; if the intermediate stage begins with /j/, I could use it to decide if a previous consonant is palatalized. Thanks!
ai > æɪ > ɛe > ɛː > ɛ
ei > ɪi > ɪː > ɪ
oi > oy > øy > øʏ > ʏː > ʏ
au > ɑ̝ʊ > ʌo > ɔː > ɛ
eu > ey > øy > øʏ > ʏː > ʏ
iu > ʲyu > ʲyː > ʲy
ou > oʊ > ʊː > ʊ
PS: Also, most of these are falling diphthongs,so I provide a set of rising ones with ideas below: Basically the same as above, plus labialization and palatalization
ia > ɪæ > ʲeɛ > ʲɛː > ʲɛ
ie > ie > ʲɪi > ʲɪː > ʲɪ
io > ʲyo > ʲyø > ʲʏø > ʲʏː > ʲʏ
ua > ʊɑ̝ > ʷoʌ > ʷɔː > ʷɔ
ue > ʷye > ʷyø > ʷʏø > ʷʏː > ʷʏ
uo > ʊo > ʷʊː > ʷʊ
ui > uy > ʷyː > ʷy
Visit my website for my blogs and information on my conlangs: http://grwilliams.net/ It's a work in progress!
-
- sinic
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 17 Jun 2018 03:04
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
My question is very similar to the one that was just answered. However, Aʻatun's vowel system is /ɑ ᴇ i ⱺ ʉ/ (/ᴇ ⱺ/ being true mid vowels), and they simplified vowels by harmony/sound similarity (/ɪ>i/, etc.). What are some possible evolutions/monophthongizations for rising and falling diphthongs in Aʻatun, including intermediate steps?
Alien conlangs (Font may be needed for Vai symbols)
- Creyeditor
- MVP
- Posts: 5121
- Joined: 14 Aug 2012 19:32
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
I would say it's the same with minor differences:
/ɑ/ = /a/
<ᴇ> /e̞/ = /e/
<ⱺ>/o̞/=/o/
/ʉ/ = /u/
/ɑ/ = /a/
<ᴇ> /e̞/ = /e/
<ⱺ>/o̞/=/o/
/ʉ/ = /u/
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 2 3 4 4
Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics
-
- sinic
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 27 Jan 2013 02:12
- Contact:
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Based on ideas from Creyeditor, I came up with this system of vowel alternations that will form the basis of my TAM system. Does this seem plausible?:
Past indicative (vowel + /u/)
a > o
e > i
i > je
o > u
u > wo
present subjunctive (vowel + /i/ or /ia/)
a > e
e > ja
i > ja
o > i
u > wi
Past indicative (vowel + /u/)
a > o
e > i
i > je
o > u
u > wo
present subjunctive (vowel + /i/ or /ia/)
a > e
e > ja
i > ja
o > i
u > wi
Visit my website for my blogs and information on my conlangs: http://grwilliams.net/ It's a work in progress!
-
- sinic
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 17 Jun 2018 03:04
Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here
Is /ɑi>ɑ/ or /ɑi>i/ plausible? If so, how, including intermediate steps? Same for /ɑʉ>ɑ/, /ⱺi>i/, and /ⱺi>ⱺ/?
Last edited by yangfiretiger121 on 14 Jul 2018 15:18, edited 1 time in total.
Alien conlangs (Font may be needed for Vai symbols)